Asia-Pacific
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by LexOrbisAn overhaul of the Indian patent application system has cut the time taken to reach a decision. Joginder Singh and Piyush Sharma of LexOrbis examine the new process and the implications -
Sponsored by LexOrbisRitika Agarwal and Sanjana J Kamat of LexOrbis summarise a ruling by the High Court of Delhi regarding proof of use and explain what it means with regard to the use of internet extracts in providing evidence
-
Sponsored by AJ ParkAJ Park reports that the introduction of an Artist Resale Royalty Scheme in New Zealand has been well received and is expected to enhance the country’s creative profile
-
Sponsored by Saint Island International Patent & Law OfficesThe introduction of an adversarial system for patent and trademark administrative cases is among the proposed changes to the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, reports Tony Chang of Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices
-
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysRanjan Narula and Shipra Alisha Philip of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys report that the approach of the Trademarks Office regarding the use of internet and website extracts as evidence has been deemed incorrect
-
Sponsored by Wanhuida Intellectual PropertyXiaohui Wu of Wanhuida Intellectual Property reports on a ruling by the Supreme People’s Court of China that emphasises that the determination of common knowledge in the assessment of inventiveness should be incontrovertible
