Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored content

Resale rights for visual artists in New Zealand by 2024

Sponsored by

aj-park.png
new-zealand-1435231.jpg

Kieran O’Connell and Florence Lundon-Moore of AJ Park report that the introduction of an Artist Resale Royalty Scheme in New Zealand has been well received and is expected to enhance the country’s creative profile

The New Zealand Government is establishing an Artist Resale Royalty Scheme (the ‘Scheme’) that will allow creators of visual arts to be recognised and rewarded when their work is resold on the secondary art market.

The Scheme will be established as part of the recent EU and UK free trade agreements. It is intended that the Scheme will:

  • Help visual artists to benefit from the resale of their original works, especially when their works appreciate over time;

  • Align New Zealand with common practice internationally and enable New Zealand artists to benefit when their artwork is resold in countries that operate reciprocal schemes; and

  • Support more sustainable careers for visual artists through continuing royalty payments, similar to other creative professionals.

The Scheme is expected to take effect by late 2024 and will entitle visual artists to a royalty each time original work is sold through the resale market.

What is a resale royalty right?

An artist’s resale royalty right, also known as a ‘droit de suite’, entitles visual artists to receive a royalty payment each time an original artwork is resold. Artists’ resale royalty rights are common internationally and generally only apply to work sold through art market intermediaries such as dealers and auctioneers. They do not generally apply to artwork sold privately.

Artwork is usually first sold or gifted by artists or their agents. At this point, the work can be worth relatively little. As it is resold over time, the artwork can increase in value, usually in parallel with the artist’s growing body of work and reputation. However, for the most part, visual artists are involved in the creation of one-off original pieces of artwork and the time of the original transaction is often the only real opportunity a visual artist has to benefit financially from their creation.

This is not the same for many other creative professions that derive economic benefit through copyright. Other artists – such as musicians, authors, and playwrights, whose works are commonly reproduced and adapted – are able to rely much more on royalties because the artwork is not typically a one-off piece.

A resale royalty right can be seen as a means of addressing this limited access to the economic benefit from the creation of an artwork.

How the Scheme will work

The Scheme will take effect once standalone legislation has been written and passed through Parliament. Under the Scheme:

  • Artists will receive a 5% royalty payment each time their work is sold and resold on the secondary market;

  • The duration will be linked to the duration of copyright, which expires 50 years from the artist’s death, but this is expected to be extended following the implementation of the free trade agreements;

  • The right will apply to transactions that involve an art market professional or transactions to and from public institutions;

  • The right is inalienable, meaning it cannot be waived or transferred, except on death;

  • The Scheme will be self-sustaining financially by deducting an administration fee from the royalties; and

  • The Scheme will be available to citizens and residents of New Zealand or residents of a reciprocating country.

Once the Scheme has been passed, a not-for-profit organisation will need to be established to handle compliance and administration.

Creative industry reaction

The proposed Scheme has been well received by the creative industry and comes after many years of discussions and lobbying.

The government hopes that the Scheme will provide important economic and symbolic benefits for visual artists by ensuring that the original artists are able to benefit from an increase in value, creating fairness between the original artists and art market professionals. This will be especially significant where the value of the art appreciates over time and as resale becomes more frequent.

It is hoped that the prospect of continuing royalty payments also supports more sustainable careers in the creative sector. Providing economic incentives to be involved with original creative works will likely increase the visibility of New Zealand’s creative profile nationally and internationally.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The IPO must change its approach and communicate with IP owners about its attempts at clearing up the trademark register
Counsel are looking at enforceability, business needs and cost savings when filing for patents overseas
James Perkins, member at Cole Schotz in Texas, reveals how smaller tech companies can protect themselves when dealing with larger players
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The EUIPO management board must provide the Council of the EU with a performance assessment before it can remove the executive director
The European Commission confirmed that plans for a unitary SPC will be published in April alongside reforms to the SEP system
The court held that SEP implementers could be injuncted or directed to pay royalties before trial if they are deemed to be unwilling licensees
Patentees should feel cautious optimism over the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G2/21, say European patent attorneys
Significant changes to the standard of law are unlikely, say sources, who note that some justices seemed sceptical that the parties disagreed on the legal standard
Sources say the High Court of Australia’s ruling that reputation is immaterial in trademark infringement cases could stop famous brands from muscling out smaller players