Asia-Pacific
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by China Patent Agent (HK)Yu Zhang and Jingchen Zhang of China Patent Agent (HK) explain how patent applicants can adjust to the latest changes in areas such as industrial designs, computer-implemented inventions, and deferred examination -
Sponsored by Kangxin PartnersRuixian Liu of Kangxin Partners analyses the key differences between the legal approaches of both jurisdictions and provides practical insights to help patent applicants navigate local challenges
-
Sponsored by Vivien Chan & CoVivien Chan and Anna Mae Koo of Vivien Chan & Co discuss how technological developments in areas such as AI and e-commerce are reshaping intellectual property protection strategies and how companies can safeguard their brands
-
Sponsored by CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law OfficeJi Liu and Shaohui Yuan of CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office explain how China balances intellectual property protection and the prevention of monopolistic behaviour, using two significant cases to demonstrate the key points
-
Sponsored by Wanhuida Intellectual PropertyZhigang Zhu, Xiaoyang Yang, and Feng Zheng of Wanhuida Intellectual Property outline the intellectual property-related challenges Chinese enterprises face in pursuing growth through overseas expansion, and explain the steps that can help navigate the complexities
-
Sponsored by Anand and AnandAchuthan Sreekumar of Anand and Anand draws on a recent High Court of Delhi ruling on the unauthorised use of Ratan Tata’s identity to consider how Indian jurisprudence protects well-known personal names
