lead position
Sponsored content
Sponsored by
Zacco
Peter Gustav Olson of Zacco draws on recent case law to consider whether the EUIPO is changing its approach to enforcement as AI drives a rapid software evolution
April 29, 2026
Features list
-
Enrique Diaz and Dhania Portilla of Goodrich Riquelme y Asociados explain potential problems with the practicality and rigour of Mexico’s new guidelines on comparative advertising -
In the last year, Mexico has approved the Madrid Protocol, agreed to sign the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), introduced new data privacy laws and implemented guidelines on comparative advertising - to name just a few major IP changes. In addition, the country recently elected a new president, which means the head of the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office (IMPI) will change, and there may be new approaches by the government on many issues that affect IP
-
IP owners looking to protect industrial designs in Mexico will be confronted with a messy mix of patent and copyright law. Luis Schmidt of Olivares explains
-
Despite a special mechanism in Mexican law to protect serial publications, Carlos Trujillo of Uhthoff Gomez Vega & Uhthoff asks whether using copyright and trade mark rights might be more effective
-
Laura Collada of Dumont considers the critical need for an effective opposition system as Mexico readies itself to accede to the Madrid Protocol
-
Managing IP’s biggest ever survey of Chinese in-house counsel reveals their IP filing plans, experience with litigation and policies on hiring foreign firms. Peter Leung spoke to ZTE, JK Sucralose, Livzon Pharmaceutical and other respondents to get the details
Local Insights
Sponsored by
Gün + Partners
A Turkish case highlights the importance of Article 138(3) when patent claims are amended during an invalidation action, say Selin Sinem Erciyas, Aysel Korkmaz Yatkın, and Bengü Şen Gürakan of Gün + Partners
Sponsored by
Hechanova Group
The proposal clarifies what constitutes proof of commercial use of a trademark in the country, report Editha R Hechanova, Noemi P Rivera, and Lance Freidrich Phillipe M Asido of Hechanova Group
Sponsored by
Inspicos
Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos provides a status update on the pending case in the lead-up to oral proceedings before the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal on May 8 2026
Sponsored by
Hanol IP & Law
Min Son of Hanol IP & Law analyses a Supreme Court ruling clarifying that prosecution history in a parent application can later limit the scope of divisional patent claims
Sponsored by
INLEX
Igor Charles and Fatima Chirazi of INLEX report on the rejection of Decathlon’s design, unfair competition, and parasitism claims over snorkelling masks, confirming a narrow scope of protection where design freedom is constrained
Sponsored by
INLEX
Social media-fuelled demand for luxury counterfeits such as the ‘Takealot Tirkin’ is reshaping consumer culture across Africa and raising pressing questions for brands. Haadya Mosafeer of INLEX finds a potential answer in Mauritius’ response
Sponsored by
Tilleke & Gibbins
Decree 134 modernises Vietnam’s copyright and related rights framework in response to rapid digital transformation, explains Thuy Thi Ngoc Huynh of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate of Tilleke & Gibbins
Sponsored by
Tilleke & Gibbins
Khin Myo Myo Aye and Niko Myint Soe of Tilleke & Gibbins outline the key filing requirements and practical considerations for securing industrial design protection under Myanmar’s developing registration system
Sponsored by
Becerril, Coca & Becerril
Luis Emilio Moncada of Becerril, Coca & Becerril explains why provisional measures are an increasingly valuable mechanism under Mexican intellectual property law as the country prepares to co-host the football World Cup
Sponsored by
RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys
Ranjan Narula and Shipra Alisha Philip of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys analyse the High Court of Delhi ruling that clarifies when the use of copyrighted footage constitutes fair dealing and trivial copying