Protecting industrial designs in Myanmar: a practical filing guide

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Protecting industrial designs in Myanmar: a practical filing guide

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Golden Rock of Mt Kyaiktiyo, Myanmar

Khin Myo Myo Aye and Niko Myint Soe of Tilleke & Gibbins outline the key filing requirements and practical considerations for securing industrial design protection under Myanmar’s developing registration system

Since Myanmar’s Industrial Design Law of 2019 came into force, the country’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) and its dedicated Industrial Design Division have worked to establish functional examination and registration procedures, bringing Myanmar’s design protection framework progressively in line with international standards.

By March 2026, roughly 300 industrial design applications had been published in the IPD’s online database, representing a meaningful benchmark in the development of this still-emerging system. Additional applications remain under examination and will be published upon completion of that process.

For rights holders looking to protect industrial design rights in Myanmar, understanding the specific filing requirements – and the practical realities of navigating them – is essential to securing timely, valid protection.

What a valid filing requires

Myanmar’s IPD requires that a defined set of particulars be submitted at the time of filing for an application to be accorded a filing date. Failing to meet these mandatory requirements from the outset can prevent a date from being established and introduce delays that may affect priority claims or commercial timelines.

The mandatory filing particulars include:

  • Full identifying information for both the applicant and the creator;

  • A notarised appointment of representative form;

  • The applicable Locarno Classification for the product to which the design relates;

  • Graphic representations of the design across multiple standard views;

  • A written description of the design; and

  • Where applicable, details relating to any priority claim or request for deferred publication.

Filing fees must also be paid upon submission.

Beyond the mandatory particulars, applicants are typically required to furnish supplementary documentation either at the time of filing or in response to queries raised during formality examination. Supplementary materials commonly include evidence establishing the applicant’s legal entitlement to the design (particularly relevant where the applicant and creator are not the same party), as well as relevant corporate and authorisation records.

Where priority rights are claimed based on an earlier foreign filing under the World Trade Organization route, which is available under the current filing practice, supporting documents must generally be filed within three months of the Myanmar application date. Any documents that are not in English must be accompanied by certified translations.

The precise supplementary requirements are not fixed and may vary depending on the specifics of the application and any issues identified during the formality review.

Practical considerations for applicants

Myanmar’s industrial design regime is still maturing, and applicants should approach the process in that context. Several considerations are worth bearing in mind:

  • Prepare supplementary documents early – even documents that are not strictly required at the time of filing should be assembled and ready. The formality examination stage can surface requests for materials that, if not readily available, can delay the examination process significantly.

  • Ensure submissions are complete and well organised incomplete or poorly organised applications are a common source of procedural objections. Taking care with the quality of the initial filing reduces the risk of avoidable back and forth with the IPD.

  • Engage a qualified local representative – applicants filing from outside Myanmar, for whom appointment of a local representative is mandatory, as well as those with complex ownership structures, should retain experienced local counsel. A representative familiar with Myanmar’s IPD processes can help anticipate examiner expectations, navigate requirements efficiently, and address issues before they become obstacles.

As Myanmar’s intellectual property system continues to develop, early movers that establish registered design rights stand to benefit from the protections the system affords. Careful preparation and foresight will help rights holders efficiently navigate the filing process and secure protection for their valuable industrial design assets in Myanmar.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The team, comprising two partners and one senior consultant, plans to offer “highly differentiated” services to clients
HGF’s new ownership model frees it from the hiring constraints of traditional partnerships, its CEO told Managing IP
New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Richard de Bodo, who had a lengthy career at international firms, shares how he will address client needs and praises the unique offerings of smaller firms
An Australian top court decision clarifying honest concurrent use and wins by publishers against AI platforms were also among the top talking points
AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Gift this article