UK government wants your views on copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK government wants your views on copyright

The UK government has published detailed proposals to clarify and extend copyright exceptions, in response to this year’s Hargreaves Review on intellectual property

The government wants businesses to provide "thoughts and evidence" on the wide-ranging reforms during a consultation period that will last until March 21 next year.

Most of the proposals concern copyright exceptions.

The government proposes creating a private copying exception. This would make it legal to copy a CD on to an MP3 player, something that many users do already.

It also wants to introduce an exception for parody and pastiche, which it says will give greater creative freedom to comedians.

The exception for non-commercial research will be widened to allow data mining, and exceptions affecting education, quotation and people with disabilities will be updated.

In addition, the government wants to establish licensing and clearance procedures for orphan works, to open them up for consumers and researchers, and to provide for voluntary extended collective licensing schemes.

These schemes, similar to those that exist in Scandinavia, would allow collecting societies to license rights on behalf of all rights owners in a sector, apart from those who have opted out.

The proposals closely follow the recommendations made in the Hargreaves Review, published on May 19. They were endorsed by Vince Cable, the business minister, in August.

Baroness Wilcox, minister for IP, said in a statement today that "some freeing up of existing copyright legislation can deliver real value to the UK economy without risking our excellent creative industries".

The Hargreaves Review was commissioned following concerns, including those expressed by Prime Minister David Cameron, that the UK might not offer a conducive climate to new technology businesses such as Google.

It is likely to attract a lot of comments. Groups representing consumers will probably welcome the proposals to clarify exceptions, but some copyright owners might feel they go too far. For example, academic publishers are known to have reservations about the data mining proposals.

There may also be concerns about overlap between national and EU or international legislation. For example, the European Commission is also planning a directive dealing with orphan works.

Another Hargreaves recommendation was the creation of a digital copyright exchange. Last month the government appointed Richard Hooper to run a feasibility study on this issue.

More information on the consultation, including the response form, is available on the IPO website. Responses can be sent to David Burgess at the IPO by email.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article