Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Peppa Pig accused of bullying and fat-shaming in IP defence

Peppa jurisdiction-comp.jpg

SConnect, which is locked in an IP war with eOne, also admitted that a third-party contractor did use audio files from Peppa Pig episodes on rival ‘Wolfoo’ videos

Vietnam-based media company SConnect, whose YouTube series about a cartoon wolf has been subject to a litigation war with Peppa Pig, has taken aim at the cartoon swine for allegedly promoting bullying, fat-shaming and “outdated gender stereotypes”.

In a defence to an infringement claim it is facing at the England and Wales High Court, SConnect has made a string of criticisms against Peppa Pig episodes.

“The content of the claimants’ Peppa Pig videos contain objectionable content, the promotion of outdated gender stereotypes and the promotion of objectionable and unmitigated behaviour, such as bullying and rudeness,” the defence said.

Media company Entertainment One (eOne), which owns the rights to Peppa Pig, has alleged copyright and trademark infringement and passing off against SConnect.

SConnect runs various YouTube channels including one called ‘Wolfoo’, which features a cartoon wolf and its friends.

SConnect’s defence, filed on March 1, said the Peppa episodes called ‘The Fire Engine’, ‘The Treehouse’ and ‘The Playground’ include bullying, fat-shaming, and sexism.

In the document, seen by Managing IP, SConnect also admitted to unwittingly copying audio files from Peppa Pig episodes. However, it still denies the allegations against it.

SConnect said a third-party contractor it briefly employed admitted to using some audio files from Peppa Pig episodes.

According to SConnect, from early 2018 to mid-2020 it used an independent third party called Le Dang Khoa to supply sound files for Wolfoo episodes.

SConnect said in its defence that it raised eOne’s allegations about audio clips with Khoa after eOne first filed its claim in January 2022, but that he had denied any wrongdoing.

However, SConnect said that in December of that year Khoa admitted to copying sounds from downloaded episodes of Peppa Pig before editing and modifying them and sending the sound files to SConnect.

“This was the first time that the defendants were aware that such copying had taken place,” the defence said.

SConnect added that all newly produced Wolfoo animations since mid-2020 have only used sounds created in-house by its sound recording facility, which it set up that same year.

Eone has alleged that Wolfoo copied the look and feel of Peppa Pig and that imagery in Wolfoo included reproductions of the scenery and background used in Peppa Pig episodes as well as some audio clips.

SConnect sought to challenge jurisdiction on the basis that the claim had not been served correctly, and that Wolfoo had not targeted UK consumers. But that claim was thrown out in December last year.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library