Lidl checks out of Tesco IP battle with partial win

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lidl checks out of Tesco IP battle with partial win

Lidl-comp.jpg

The UK High Court backed Lidl in passing off and copyright infringement claims against Tesco, but it wasn’t a clean sweep for the German supermarket

The England and Wales High Court today handed victory to Lidl in the battle of the supermarkets, ruling that Tesco’s Clubcard logo infringed Lidl’s store logo.

In her judgment, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith found Tesco had taken unfair advantage of Lidl’s reputation and had damaged the distinctive character of the Lidl logo.

Both logos feature a yellow circle on a blue square. Lidl’s has a thin red border around it.

Tesco was deemed liable for passing off as well as trademark and copyright infringement.

According to Smith’s judgment, the Clubcard design was “immediately appreciated” by Tesco employees as being likely to cause confusion with Lidl but Tesco went ahead with the Clubcard Prices promotion in any event.

However, a Lidl-owned wordless mark for the same logo was invalidated on the grounds that it had been applied for in bad faith.

In November last year, Managing IP reported that Tesco had been granted permission to advance claims of bad faith on the grounds that a trademark for a wordless version of Lidl’s logo – despite never having been used in the UK – had been continually refiled by the German-owned supermarket.

Tesco’s ‘Clubcard Price’ loyalty discount scheme, which launched in 2020, offers discounts on selected items to Clubcard members.

A spokesperson for Tesco said it is surprised and disappointed by the decision and intends to appeal.

A Lidl spokesperson said: “We asked Tesco to change its Clubcard logo, but they refused, making it necessary to bring this case. We are pleased that the court has agreed with us and that it will now order Tesco to stop using the logo.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
As Marshall Gerstein celebrates its 70-year anniversary, Jeffrey Sharp, managing partner, reflects on lessons that shaped both his career and the firm’s success
Gift this article