Data exclusivity backed by Mexican courts
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Data exclusivity backed by Mexican courts

novartis.jpg

When Mexico's Seventh Auxiliary Circuit Court issued a final decision in June upholding a ruling by the Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Affairs (the country's specialised IP court) in favour of data package exclusivity (DPE) protection, it marked a turning point for pharma inventions in Mexico. The appeals court agreed that Novartis has a right to block reliance by third parties on its clinical information, subject to the determination that the efforts incurred were considerable from a monetary investment and time perspective. It further ruled that the FCTAA must determine that Novartis's efforts were considerable, based on the number of patients and countries where clinical trials took place. In response to the ruling and lobbying efforts by R&D companies, Mexico's health authority COFEPRIS published guidelines in June recommending protection for DPE rights.

Alejandro Luna of Olivares & Cia, which represented Novartis, said he is concerned that the proposal offers no explicit protection for biologics and limits the protection of DPE rights to a maximum of five years. Additionally, it is unclear whether such internal guidance will stand up considering the lack of domestic statutory law recognising DPE.

This case was selected as one of Managing IP’s Cases of the Year for 2012.

To see the rest, click on one of the cases below.

The 10 cases of the year

A fillip for the EU pharmaceutical sector

Relief for trade mark owners in red sole saga

Australian TV streaming service held to be illegal

Smartphone war hits front page in the US

Liberalising the EU’s software market

India allows parallel imports

Victory for fair dealing in Canada

Lacoste loses its trade mark in China

Google prevails in Android attack

EU test case clarifies class headings

Ten you might have missed

Canada: Ambiguous claims can invalidate patents

Russia: Certainty on parallel imports

Italy: TV formats win copyright for the first time

First FRAND cases litigated worldwide

Monsanto loses in Brazil

Data exclusivity backed by Mexican courts

China: A shift over OEM manufacturing

Authors in the US able to reclaim joint copyrights

Germany: Knitted trainers a sign of the future

India: Financial Times loses trade mark

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Cross-border judicial collaboration and EU copyright were hot topics on the second day of the EUIPO’s 5th IP Case Law Conference
Nancy Linck, who is 82, explains why she found something new to excite her at Carmichael IP
On day one of the EUIPO’s Case Law Conference, delegates heard why single-letter trademarks are weak and received an update on the EU’s design law shakeup
High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Gift this article