Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

European Union flag against European Parliament

The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers

The European Parliament today, February 28, voted in favour of the European Commission’s plan to overhaul the framework for standard-essential patents.

Under the rules, the EUIPO, which is responsible for EU trademarks and designs, would operate a public register of SEPs, test their essentiality, and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory royalties for implementers to pay patent owners.

SEP owners would be barred from enforcing their patents in court while the EUIPO-led process, mooted to take nine months, is ongoing.

The final vote was 454 in favour and 83 against, with 78 abstentions.

The proposals have caused deep divisions among SEP owners and implementers.

SEP owners believe that implementing companies, such as Lenovo and Apple, attempt to delay licensing negotiations while continuing to use the relevant SEPs. Implementers say they are charged unfair rates by SEP owners, who have benefitted from a lack of transparency by not having to make licensing terms public.

Concerns have also been raised about the role of the EUIPO, which currently has no experience of dealing with patents. However, in an interview with Managing IP, the EUIPO’s executive director João Negrão said the office could handle anything that comes its way. 

Talks will now proceed between the Council of the EU and the commission and there could yet be further roadblocks in place.

Several member states on the council have signalled their disapproval, while there is the added factor that there are European elections in June.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article