Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

European Union flag against European Parliament

The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers

The European Parliament today, February 28, voted in favour of the European Commission’s plan to overhaul the framework for standard-essential patents.

Under the rules, the EUIPO, which is responsible for EU trademarks and designs, would operate a public register of SEPs, test their essentiality, and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory royalties for implementers to pay patent owners.

SEP owners would be barred from enforcing their patents in court while the EUIPO-led process, mooted to take nine months, is ongoing.

The final vote was 454 in favour and 83 against, with 78 abstentions.

The proposals have caused deep divisions among SEP owners and implementers.

SEP owners believe that implementing companies, such as Lenovo and Apple, attempt to delay licensing negotiations while continuing to use the relevant SEPs. Implementers say they are charged unfair rates by SEP owners, who have benefitted from a lack of transparency by not having to make licensing terms public.

Concerns have also been raised about the role of the EUIPO, which currently has no experience of dealing with patents. However, in an interview with Managing IP, the EUIPO’s executive director João Negrão said the office could handle anything that comes its way. 

Talks will now proceed between the Council of the EU and the commission and there could yet be further roadblocks in place.

Several member states on the council have signalled their disapproval, while there is the added factor that there are European elections in June.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Managing IP will host a ceremony in Kuala Lumpur on November 5 to reveal the winners
Recent lateral moves raise a bigger question for full-service firms – can patent litigation remain a strategic priority when competing practices generate larger profits?
As counterfeiters grow increasingly sophisticated, Gibson Dunn is differentiating its trademark practice through a focus on payment tracing, judgment enforcement and asset recovery
Anita Polott, who is celebrating three decades at Morgan Lewis this year, reflects on career progression, stepping into unfamiliar territory, and leadership frameworks
Technical excellence remains essential, but many firms are discovering that packaging IP with complementary practice areas can unlock new clients and a stronger competitive position
As international interest in Southeast Asia grows, Sheng Rong Tng discusses how changing client demands and the firm’s multidisciplinary model are helping it compete for complex regional mandates
Todd Hopfinger, director in Sterne Kessler’s electronics practice group, says IP owners are contemplating how patent rights will be enforced as commercial activity expands beyond Earth
Christopher Stothers' arrival strengthens the firm's life sciences, technology and UPC offering as competition for top European litigators intensifies
Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
Gift this article