Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

European Union flag against European Parliament

The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers

The European Parliament today, February 28, voted in favour of the European Commission’s plan to overhaul the framework for standard-essential patents.

Under the rules, the EUIPO, which is responsible for EU trademarks and designs, would operate a public register of SEPs, test their essentiality, and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory royalties for implementers to pay patent owners.

SEP owners would be barred from enforcing their patents in court while the EUIPO-led process, mooted to take nine months, is ongoing.

The final vote was 454 in favour and 83 against, with 78 abstentions.

The proposals have caused deep divisions among SEP owners and implementers.

SEP owners believe that implementing companies, such as Lenovo and Apple, attempt to delay licensing negotiations while continuing to use the relevant SEPs. Implementers say they are charged unfair rates by SEP owners, who have benefitted from a lack of transparency by not having to make licensing terms public.

Concerns have also been raised about the role of the EUIPO, which currently has no experience of dealing with patents. However, in an interview with Managing IP, the EUIPO’s executive director João Negrão said the office could handle anything that comes its way. 

Talks will now proceed between the Council of the EU and the commission and there could yet be further roadblocks in place.

Several member states on the council have signalled their disapproval, while there is the added factor that there are European elections in June.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Gift this article