Exclusive: Dolby sues Lava in India over audio coding SEPs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Exclusive: Dolby sues Lava in India over audio coding SEPs

Dolby.jpg

Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant

Dolby has sued Indian smartphone maker Lava at the Delhi High Court for allegedly infringing its advanced audio coding standard-essential patents, Managing IP can reveal.

The lawsuit, filed on Monday, April 29, comes shortly after another patent innovator, Ericsson, secured record SEP damages of ₹244 crores ($29 million) in March against Lava. However, that lawsuit centred on Ericsson’s telecom patents.

In its pleadings, Dolby accused Lava of infringing eight patents covering its advanced audio coding (AAC) SEPs. Dolby licenses the SEPs bilaterally as well as through patent pool operator Via LA Licensing.

Five of those patents expired during its licensing negotiations with Lava, but Dolby claimed that it is still entitled to relief based on past profits made by Lava.

Implementers that have already taken licences from Dolby for its AAC technology include Oppo, Vivo and Reliance.

Both Dolby and Lava have been in licensing discussions for six years but haven't been able to agree on terms.

Separately, Lava has been in touch with Via LA Licensing to secure a licence for the pool’s AAC patents.

In its lawsuit, Dolby has asked the court to secure its interests by ordering Lava to make an interim security deposit or face an interim injunction.

The matter was listed for the first hearing yesterday, May 1. Lava said in a statement before the court that it wanted to resolve the case amicably.

The case will be next heard on May 20. Singh & Singh is representing Dolby.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Gift this article