Exclusive: Dolby sues Lava in India over audio coding SEPs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Exclusive: Dolby sues Lava in India over audio coding SEPs

Dolby.jpg

Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant

Dolby has sued Indian smartphone maker Lava at the Delhi High Court for allegedly infringing its advanced audio coding standard-essential patents, Managing IP can reveal.

The lawsuit, filed on Monday, April 29, comes shortly after another patent innovator, Ericsson, secured record SEP damages of ₹244 crores ($29 million) in March against Lava. However, that lawsuit centred on Ericsson’s telecom patents.

In its pleadings, Dolby accused Lava of infringing eight patents covering its advanced audio coding (AAC) SEPs. Dolby licenses the SEPs bilaterally as well as through patent pool operator Via LA Licensing.

Five of those patents expired during its licensing negotiations with Lava, but Dolby claimed that it is still entitled to relief based on past profits made by Lava.

Implementers that have already taken licences from Dolby for its AAC technology include Oppo, Vivo and Reliance.

Both Dolby and Lava have been in licensing discussions for six years but haven't been able to agree on terms.

Separately, Lava has been in touch with Via LA Licensing to secure a licence for the pool’s AAC patents.

In its lawsuit, Dolby has asked the court to secure its interests by ordering Lava to make an interim security deposit or face an interim injunction.

The matter was listed for the first hearing yesterday, May 1. Lava said in a statement before the court that it wanted to resolve the case amicably.

The case will be next heard on May 20. Singh & Singh is representing Dolby.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Gift this article