EU test case clarifies class headings
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU test case clarifies class headings

Case of the Year: CIPA v UK government

ohim.jpg

The result

Trade mark applicants must be specific when using class headings

The impact

OHIM classification practice overhauled, but questions remain

How much protection does a Community trade mark provide? Sixteen years after they were introduced, and despite more than 1 million applications, there is still doubt as to the answer.

One reason for this was OHIM's approach to applications that listed all the general indications in a class heading in the application, rather than identifying particular goods or services. Such applications should be treated as claiming all the goods and services in the class, said OHIM. But most national offices in Europe disagreed, applying the rule that the general indications only cover their plain meaning.

Trade mark applicants were left confused. OHIM's approach gave rights owners more protection in principle, but also led to legal uncertainty. In a bid to clear up the chaos, the UK's Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) launched a test case before the UK IPO, applying for the mark IP Translator in class 41, listing the general indications: the application was rejected as descriptive as class 41 covers translation services.

That led to three questions being submitted to the Court of Justice of the EU, the Grand Chamber of which gave its ruling in the case on June 19. Largely rejecting OHIM's class-heading-covers-all approach, it said that applicants must identify the goods and services "with sufficient clarity and precision". If the general indications of a class heading are used, said the Court, the applicant must specify whether the application is intended to cover all the goods and services in the alphabetical list of the class, or only some.

In a sign of how seriously it viewed the decision, OHIM published lengthy new guidelines just a day later, saying that if applicants want to claim all goods or services in the alphabetical list for a particular class, they can do so by ticking a declaration on the filing form. It also set out how historic applications would be treated.

But, despite the deep thinking that had clearly gone into this carefully balanced new policy, it was immediately criticised by some trade mark owners. On July 4, for example, MARQUES wrote a letter arguing that OHIM's new approach did not provide the required clarity and precision, and meant that third parties would have to refer to old versions of the Nice Classification to understand the scope of registrations.

That suggests that a full answer to this complex question remains elusive – but there is hope. OHIM has launched five projects with European national offices in its so-called Convergence Programme, and two of these concern classification and class headings. The work, which continues, involves the creation of a harmonised database of classification terms, presented as a taxonomy. If, as is likely, they are adopted by most EU national offices, as well as OHIM and WIPO, the projects will go a long way to finally giving us a harmonised approach to trade mark class headings in Europe.

Case details Designs

CIPA v UK government

Trade mark: IP Translator (Class 41)

Office: UK IPO

Trade mark number: 2528977

Applicant: Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA)

Court: Court of Justice of the EU

Case number: C-307/10

For CIPA: Michael Edenborough QC

For the UK government: Simon Malynicz


This case was selected as one of Managing IP’s Cases of the Year for 2012.

To see the rest, click on one of the cases below.

The 10 cases of the year

A fillip for the EU pharmaceutical sector

Relief for trade mark owners in red sole saga

Australian TV streaming service held to be illegal

Smartphone war hits front page in the US

Liberalising the EU’s software market

India allows parallel imports

Victory for fair dealing in Canada

Lacoste loses its trade mark in China

Google prevails in Android attack

EU test case clarifies class headings

Ten you might have missed

Canada: Ambiguous claims can invalidate patents

Russia: Certainty on parallel imports

Italy: TV formats win copyright for the first time

First FRAND cases litigated worldwide

Monsanto loses in Brazil

Data exclusivity backed by Mexican courts

China: A shift over OEM manufacturing

Authors in the US able to reclaim joint copyrights

Germany: Knitted trainers a sign of the future

India: Financial Times loses trade mark

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A 36-member team from Zhong Lun Law Firm, including six partners, will join the newly formed East IP Group
The Delhi High Court sided with Ericsson against Indian smartphone maker Lava, bringing the companies' nine-year dispute to a close
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Gift this article