All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Now online: IP Stars 2016 Copyright Rankings

IP Stars stacked 400

The final part of the annual IP Stars rankings of the leading firms for intellectual property work worldwide is now available

We are delighted to announce that we have published the remaining 2016 rankings of the top firms for copyright work in over 20 jurisdictions. These comprise: Australia, Canada, China, Germany, France, India, Italy, Mexico, South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. 

Rankings explained

These are the final firm rankings for this year. All of those firms listed this year deserve congratulations on being included. All the rankings you see on IP Stars website will remain unchanged, save for any later changes to firm names, until we publish new rankings in 2017.

Firms are ranked in “Tiers”, or as "Highly Recommended" or "Recommended" for each practice area. Tiers 1 and 2 are our top-tier rankings. The total number of firms listed, as well as tiers, varies by jurisdiction.

Patent and trade marks

For the prosecution ranking we consider all work before the IP office, both pre- and post-grant. The contentious ranking considers dispute resolution and all other IP-related legal work.

Copyright

For the copyright ranking we consider both non-contentious (such as licensing) and dispute resolution work. The top-tier firms are those we reasonably believe have specialists who can advise rights holders on the cutting edge issues in copyright.

Another important attribute of these firms is that they represent clients in a broad range of copyright-based industries – from publishing and entertainment to technology. 

You can read all the firm rankings in over 70 jurisdictions for free simply by clicking here.

Research methodology

The IP Stars rankings are based on extensive research carried out over a six-month period, starting from October each year. To produce the rankings, our team of researchers in London, New York and Hong Kong obtain information from thousands of firms and their clients by phone, online surveys, email and in face-to-face meetings. Researchers also conduct desk research for other available information. The attributes assessed include the firm’s workload and its sophistication, quality of work and strength of the team.

The research is independent and rigorous. No firm can pay to be included, or solicit recommendations, and Managing IP does not recommend or endorse any particular firms or individuals.

All the 2016 rankings are based on information available when the research was concluded. Please see more information below.

What's next

2016 Firm Analysis & Stars

The firm analysis and individual IP stars list still on our website are from the 2015 edition of the IP Stars handbooks. Later in the year we will publish our latest commentaries on the ranked firms, and the 2016 list of individual IP stars on the website. These, including all the rankings, will also be published in the 2016 edition of the IP Stars handbooks.

The copyright rankings are also published in the April paper issue of Managing IP, which is distributed to subscribers. Subscribe online to order your own copy.

Learn more about IP Stars

For more information on IP Stars, including details of how to participate, publication dates, FAQs and for advertising enquiries, see our new post on the IP Stars website.

The research for 2017 rankings starts again later this year! For the latest news and developments follow @IP_STARS and @ManagingIP.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Morgan Lewis snags Duane Morris patent team; Purdue University drops smartphone suit against Google; Meta faces $175m bill over voice comms patents; Vans wants ‘Old Skool’ parody off market; SG wants SCOTUS review on TM extraterritoriality; Netflix drops Bridgerton musical case
Managing IP has partnered with IP leaders from across the Asia-Pacific region to analyse recent court cases and analyse incoming regulations in India, Korea, and Japan
Simon Malynicz tells Managing IP why he went back to Hogarth Chambers from Three New Square
Sources at five litigation funders explain how they identify new IP business and how counsel can help
Lawyers at Pinsent Masons explore strategic opportunities at the UPC for patentees and potential defendants
The claim filed at the England and Wales High Court follows lawsuits launched by Moderna in the US and Germany
Litigation funders set out what they look for in cases and how external lawyers can get their attention
The NIST director and register of copyrights were added as co-vice chairs of the Council for Inclusive Innovation, among others
Unnat Pandit, the newly appointed head of the Indian IP office, is working on bridging communication gaps and using tech to resolve administrative holdups
Erso Capital said the decision to create a pool specifically for patent litigation was based on rising demand in the tech and life sciences sectors
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree