All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Denmark

12th annual awards announces winners
Managing IP is delighted to reveal some of the IP STARS 2022 rankings of the leading firms for patent work
Lamar Smith says RAIA undermines AIA; Com Laude and iaidō join forces; Germany voices opposition to COVID waiver; Arvin Patel leaves IV for Nokia
The LMG Life Sciences Awards is excited to present its shortlist for the 2022 EMEA Awards
Sponsored

Sponsored

  • Sponsored by Inspicos
    The European Patent Office (EPO)’s requirement for the description of a patent to confirm the claims at the final stage of grant or opposition proceedings is coming under attack, as Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos explains
  • Sponsored by Inspicos
    Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos P/S explains the findings of a recent decision by the EPO Board of Appeal, which permits the introduction of new facts and evidence in proceedings
  • Sponsored by Inspicos
    At the beginning of 1998, the EPO began allowing oral proceedings to be held as a video conference (OJ EPO 1997, 572). Video conferencing was only available for oral proceedings held before an examining division, i.e. prior to grant of the European patent. Oral proceedings before examining divisions are more suited to video conferencing as they are usually shorter and less complex than opposition oral proceedings, they are not open to the public, and only one party is present (the patent applicant).