Case preview: database rights at play as Ordnance Survey in court
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Case preview: database rights at play as Ordnance Survey in court

Royal Court of Justice

Ordnance Survey, the national mapping agency for Great Britain, is in court this week to defend a case in which IP and database rights are at issue

This claim, being heard in the England & Wales High Court this week, relates to a product developed by small and medium-sized enterprise (SME), 77M, called “Matrix”. 

The system is a database of geospatial and other information. It provides customers with data including details of buildings, their coordinates and other attributes.

77M submits that it has spent more than £500,000 ($628,000) in developing the product and, in the process, has licensed data from several organisations, including Ordnance Survey (OS) – the government-owned mapping agency in the UK.

In 2016, 77M sought a declaration of non-infringement of OS’s IP rights. 

OS believes 77M can't make such a declaration and that the company has infringed its IP rights. It adds that 77M never had consent to use OS’s data in the first place.

According to 77M, OS has failed to explain what copyright or database rights it owns which may have been infringed.

In August 2016, 77M issued a claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court seeking:

• A declaration that the development of its product does not infringe any database or copyright belonging to OS, and is not in breach of any contract with OS;

• A declaration that the licensing or use of the product by its customers does not infringe such rights or breach any contract with the OS;

• An injunction to restrain OS from making any allegations to the contrary effect; and

• An injunction to restrain OS from instructing third parties to withhold data from 77M.

The case was later transferred to the main Chancery Division. 

Bournemouth-based firm Laceys Solicitors, which took over from Ince Gordon Dadds earlier this year, is acting for 77M. The firm has instructed barrister Jaani Riordan of 8 New Square.

International firm Fieldfisher, acting for OS, has instructed Lindsay Lane QC and Jessie Bowhill, both also of 8 New Square.

The case will last two weeks from today (Monday), with arguments first being aired on Wednesday. 

An OS spokesperson said: “At this time our focus is on preparing for the trial, which commences on Wednesday July 17. We expect the trial to conclude by the end of July with judgment being delivered following the summer recess. We will not be commenting on matters relating to the trial until the judgment has been given.” 

A 77M spokesperson says it believes the company has a strong case and is looking forward to its day in court. 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Malisheia Douglas, who spent six years at Eaton Corporation, said she was attracted by the firm's global footprint
The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers
Daniel Poh talks about his journey to becoming managing partner and how firms can win new business from Chinese companies
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
Gift this article