India
Christine Chiramel, who joins a full-service law firm after 17 years of working at specialist firms, says she’s excited to explore how corporate commercial issues are blurring into IP
Practitioners say increasing the pecuniary jurisdiction of India’s most popular IP litigation forum to around $2 million would spark unpredictability and make it difficult for SMEs to benefit
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysRanjan Narula and Shipra Alisha Philip of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys underline the importance of trademark protection in a booming nutraceuticals market in India and explain what steps brand owners should take
-
Sponsored by Remfry & SagarAn increasing number of AI-based patent applications and an efficiency drive at the Indian IP office are among the trends identified by Bisman Kaur of Remfry & Sagar in India’s dynamic IP space
-
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysThe exponential growth of influencer marketing through platforms such as Instagram and YouTube has demanded a regulatory and judicial reaction in India, say Ranjan Narula and Abhishek Nangia of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys
-
Sponsored by Remfry & SagarPankaj Soni and Sanhita Chatterjee of Remfry & Sagar report on a landmark judgment in a long-running dispute between Intex and Ericsson
-
Sponsored by Remfry & SagarDevika Mehra and Devaki Sharma of Remfry & Sagar highlight India’s ambitious initiative to protect and promote its domestic handicrafts and produce via geographical indications
-
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysRanjan Narula and Suvarna Pandey of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys analyse the fiery ruling which declared ‘an order which contains reasons that no one can understand is worse than an unreasoned order’