Firm
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Novo Nordisk losing patent rights covering Ozempic in Canada and a US Supreme Court decision favouring Ed Sheeran were also among the top talking points
The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by Bird & BirdCharlotte Colthurst of Bird & Bird explains why the territorial aspect of trademark rights ownership creates complications in infringement cases where there are multi-jurisdictional sales involved -
Sponsored by Audiri VoxSarmad Manto of Audiri Vox outlines the complex relationship between Islamic law and IP rights, offering guidance to companies seeking to do business in the Middle East
-
Sponsored by Hechanova GroupEditha Hechanova of Hechanova Group overviews the Philippines’ recent overhaul of its trademark regulations, with significant repercussions for foreign applicants
-
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP AttorneysRanjan Narula and Suvarna Pandey of RNA Technology and IP Attorneys analyse the fiery ruling which declared ‘an order which contains reasons that no one can understand is worse than an unreasoned order’
-
Sponsored by Hanol IP & LawAt an exciting time in South Korea’s IP evolution, Min Son of Hanol IP & Law reports on the jurisdiction’s new user-friendly trademark measures.
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersGüldeniz Doğan Alkan and Cansu Evren of Gün + Partners say that a recent ruling raises the question of how many trademarks should be imitated for an act of bad faith to be recognised
