Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Expert Analysis

lead position
Sponsored content
Sponsored by GlobalBlock
The domain blocking service provides centralised brand protection and rights enforcement on a rapidly growing scale
March 31, 2026
Features list
  • Pooja Dodd and Arpan Banerjee from IP Gurus look into the differences between UK and Indian efforts in addressing groundless infringement threats
  • This year 12 people from the Asia-Pacific region made it into Managing IP’s list of the 50 people shaping the future of IP. Peter Ollier introduces their profiles
  • Ugur G Yalçiner and Irmak Yalçiner of Yalçiner Patent and Consulting look at the turning point in modern day Turkey’s industrial property system
  • Ramesh C Dhawan and Meetu Singh of Lall Lahiri & Salhotra provide an overview of the nuances and recent developments in Indian patent laws
  • Abhai Pandey and Kamakhya Srivastava of Lex Orbis IP Practice discuss how recent patent cases have built a body of precedent that will shape litigation for years to come
  • Welcome to the eighth edition of Managing IP's India Focus. We have a diverse selection of articles this year that shows the wide range of issues facing India's IP system. These vary from questions over software patents and the patentability of pharmaceutical products to missing files at the trade mark office and accession to the Madrid Protocol. As this supplement goes to press, a key case dealing with the patentability of Novartis's anti-cancer drug Glivec is being argued at the Supreme Court. Patent practitioners are hoping the judgment may finally shed some light on the notorious Section 3(d) of the country's Patent Act. And in the Monsoon session of Parliament India's politicians may pass far-reaching amendments to the country's Copyright Act.
Local Insights
Sponsored by Hechanova Group
Editha R Hechanova and Timothy J David of Hechanova Group outline the guidelines from the Philippine Supreme Court, which expand virtual hearings nationwide while introducing procedural safeguards, public access rules, and overseas participation provisions
Sponsored by Inventa
Inês Monteiro Alves of Inventa analyses the trademark implications resulting from the acquisition of the fact-checking TV programme from the broadcaster SIC
Sponsored by United Trademark & Patent Services
M Talal Farrukh Irfan Khan of United Trademark & Patent Services explores the UAE’s evolving approach to AI regulation, combining federal and sector-specific legislation, free zone frameworks, and national policy initiatives
Sponsored by Hanol IP & Law
A landmark case involving the remodelling of luxury brand bags at the owner’s request has established legal principles on the trademark implications of such services, explains Min Son of Hanol IP & Law
Sponsored by Patrinos & Kilimiris
Maria Kilimiris of Patrinos & Kilimiris explains a recent decision regarding how genuine use is assessed for trademarks registered across broad categories of goods and their subcategories
Sponsored by Berken IP
María Aurora García of Berken IP examines how Argentine courts are using dynamic injunctions to tackle illegal sports streaming, particularly in the context of major events such as the football World Cup
Sponsored by Bird & Bird
Annika Lückemann and Jan van Dieck of Bird & Bird analyse the Unified Patent Court’s opening ruling concerning a supplementary protection certificate, highlighting procedural peculiarities, urgency considerations, and possible implications for pharmaceutical originator-generic disputes
Sponsored by RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys
Ranjan Narula and Parth Bajaj of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys analyse new obligations concerning synthetically generated information, accelerated takedown provisions, and safe harbour implications amid rising SGI-driven scams
Sponsored by Tilleke & Gibbins
Loc Xuan Le of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate firm of Tilleke & Gibbins, outlines key amendments to Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property concerning AI use of protected IP objects
Sponsored by Tilleke & Gibbins
Wiramrudee (Pink) Mokkhavesa and Tanapong Pongburanakit of Tilleke & Gibbins say Thai courts’ evolving approach to criminal intellectual property damages enables brand owners to enhance return on investment in raids and avoid civil litigation