China
Three sources explain why a notification by Nanjing’s IP centre in China banning AI use in patent drafting is too broad and could be difficult to enforce
Monday’s coverage includes news of a potentially 'game-changing' trademark development in China and how practitioners are using AI
Heath Hoglund talks about the value proposition of patent pools and why it went ahead with its first-ever series of pool meetings in China
The deal could mean that hundreds of licensees in the pool would have access to a broader range of VVC patents
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by Tahota Law FirmIn the first of a two-part series, Charles Feng, Lian Xue and Yifan Lu of Tahota outline the key features of China’s new measures for the cross-border sharing of personal information -
Sponsored by Panawell & PartnersVictor Guo of Panawell & Partners analyses fascinating China case law, highlighting inconsistencies in the application of trademark registration legislation
-
Sponsored by Wanhuida Intellectual PropertyWu Xiaohui of Wanhuida Intellectual Property explains a pioneering case heard by the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court and considers its implications for original and generic drug makers
-
Sponsored by Kangxin PartnersRuixian Liu of Kangxin Partners considers what patentees can do to prevent claims being declared invalid because their amendments go beyond the scope of the original application
-
Sponsored by Wanhuida Intellectual PropertyJianhui Li of Wanhuida Intellectual Property explains how China addresses the question of whether the features of an administration process limit a patented product and distinguish it from prior art
-
Sponsored by Wanhuida Intellectual PropertyYue Guan of Wanhuida Intellectual Property reports on a case in China that has implications for the drafting of compound patents incorporating Markush claims
