China: Measures for the standard contract for outbound transfer of personal information – part one

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Measures for the standard contract for outbound transfer of personal information – part one

Sponsored by

Tahota logo.JPG
social-media-1635577 (1).jpg

In the first of a two-part series, Charles Feng, Lian Xue and Yifan Lu of Tahota outline the key features of China’s new measures for the cross-border sharing of personal information

On February 24 2023, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) published the Measures for the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information (the Measures). It also published its annexes of Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information (Standard Contract), which will be implemented from June 1 2023. The Measures were issued after the issuance of the Security Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfers in September 2022. The Measures, along with a security assessment and personal information protection certification, will be one of the three major approaches for the outbound transfer of personal information.

In comparison to the other two routes, the Standard Contract for personal information is widely regarded as having certain advantages. These include lower costs and an easier operation, with high reference and application value for enterprises with cross-border personal information transfers. In conjunction with the new Measures and the Standard Contract, there are the following key points that enterprises need to focus on in their compliance work for cross-border personal information transfer.

Salient features of the Standard Contract

Strict format contract

In comparison to previous drafts of the Measures and Standard Contract for public comments, the official version of the Standard Contract further restricted the autonomy of will. The domestic personal information processor and the overseas recipient must sign and perform in strict accordance with the terms provided by the CAC. In addition, only the CAC is authorised to amend and modify the Standard Contract. The Standard Contract of the Measures is complete and specific, covering various aspects including:

  • Basic information;

  • Obligations of personal information processors and overseas recipients;

  • Rights and obligations of subjects of personal information;

  • The relationship between laws and regulations of the receiving place and the performance of the Standard Contract; and

  • Remedies and liabilities for breach of contract.

In addition, the Measures clearly stipulate that enterprises must not make additional agreements or any other forms of documents that conflict with the terms of the Standard Contract.

Recordation of the Standard Contract

According to the Measures, personal information processors are required to file a recordal of the Standard Contract with their local cyberspace administration within 10 working days from the effective date of the Standard Contract. Compared to the security assessment, the application of the Standard Contract is ampler in terms of preparation time and simpler in terms of administrative procedures. For enterprises that meet the requirements of the Standard Contract, such a path is undoubtedly more convenient and flexible, which is an advantage.

Protection of rights of the owner of personal information

The Standard Contract embodies the rights and obligations of three parties, namely: the domestic personal information processor, the overseas recipient and the owner of personal information. The establishment of the Standard Contract between the domestic personal information processor and the overseas recipient as the contracting parties will have a direct impact on the rights of the owner of personal information. The Standard Contract provides the owner of personal information as:

  • A beneficiary, and

  • Authorised to sue the personal information processor and the overseas recipient directly.

The Standard Contract also facilitates litigation and remedies for the owner of personal information through joint and several liability clauses if infringement occurs.

Tahota would like to thank Jing-mei Luo for their contribution to the article.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three sources explain why a notification by Nanjing’s IP centre in China banning AI use in patent drafting is too broad and could be difficult to enforce
Sheppard Mullin’s latest hires explain why the firm's industry expertise impressed them
Elizabeth Godfrey explains why she doesn’t believe in a ‘salesperson’ approach to BD, and reveals how AI is playing an important role at Davies Collison Cave
Partner moves data from April and May showed the firm boosted its presence in California, while another firm expanded in Atlanta
Angela Oliver shares tips for preparing oral arguments, and reveals her passion for marine biology
The Getty Images v Stability AI case, which will hear untested points of law, is a reminder of the importance of the legal system and the excitement it can generate
Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Gift this article