Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

2026 Edition

Austrian IP boutique ABP Anwälte Burger & Partner is recommended for IP disputes. The firm is also experienced in handling trade mark filing and prosecution work.  

Notable patent practitioners: Thomas Riesenhuber and lawyers like Katarina Casals Ide and Clemens Ofner.  

Notable practitioners: Hannes Burger and Eike Schaper.  

Hannes Burger is the managing partner.

2026

"The firm stands out for its quick responses, hands-on approach, and great understanding of the industry."

Alexander Hofmann

"Responsive, hands-on approach, in-depth knowledge of trademark law."

Puchberger & Partner specialises in IP protection and portfolio management work. The firm’s patent attorneys cover technical fields such as mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, software, chemistry, and telecommunications. They also have formidable experience in patent litigation support work. 

Notable patent practitioners: Peter Puchberger, Andreas Gehring and Georg Puchberger.

Chemistry patent specialist Peter Puchberger heads the practice.

Taylor Wessing's IP practice in Austria is recommended for contentious and non-contentious IP work including trade mark filing.

Notable IP practitioner: Thomas Adocker.

Anwälte Burger und Partner
7 practice areas
View full profile

From the first idea to the worldwide assertion of rights including the personal assistance on the ground: ABP Attorneys Burger and Partner offers comprehensive support in the field of IP.

Companies all over the world benefit from the concentration of our know-how in the special field of IP, regardless of whether matters in the USA, Europe, Russia or the Asian region such as China or Japan are included.

ABP has a large, synchronized and experienced team of attorneys at law, searchers and technical engineers as well as a professional network of lawyers in all countries of the world.

We are a motivated team communicating by means of state-of-the-art media.

ABP protects success.

Network Memberships
AIPPI, ECTA, INTA, MARQUES

Puchberger & Partner
7 practice areas
View full profile

Puchberger & Partner is a Vienna-based firm of patent attorneys. They are recognized as a leading Austrian firm for patent and trademark prosecution. They regularly file patents and trademarks at the Austrian Patent Office, the European Patent Office, and the EUIPO.
The firm is also active in handling IP disputes, particularly patent and trademark litigation at the Austrian Patent Office and the Commercial court of Vienna. There, they regularly represent clients in patent and trademark cancellation and infringement suits.

They also offer due diligence support, such as Freedom-to-Operate analyses and extensive patent search services. They have in-house prior-art search capabilities in the field of mechanical engineering, electronics, chemistry, and pharmaceutics, which are highly recommended by clients.

They further offer consulting regarding IP contracts such as license agreements, IP assignments, and recordals at the Austrian Patent Office, the EUIPO and WIPO.
Puchberger’s professionals are members of INTA, AIPPI, FICPI and ECTA and regularly attend the respective meetings.

Georg Puchberger is particularly active in the Austrian section of FICPI; Andreas Gehring is a member of the EPI Professional Education Committee, as well as a member of the Trademark Offices Committee of INTA and the IP Office Practice Committee at AIPPI. Andreas and Georg have both received the European Patent Litigators Certificate; Andreas also serves as a lecturer for CEIPI Strasbourg. Both Andreas and Georg have published sections in textbooks on Austrian Patent Law and practice at the Austrian Patent Office.

In client interviews, Puchberger’s attorneys are described as "extremely knowledgeable, thoughtful and serious", "always on top and up to date", and "always willing to go the extra mile".

Baker McKenzie
6 practice areas
View full profile

With extensive global reach and deep local expertise, we offer an unparalleled
blend of skills to help our clients navigate the complexities and seize the
opportunities of doing business in Singapore and across the Asia Pacific region. Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow, a joint law venture between Baker McKenzie and
Wong & Leow LLC, stands at the forefront of legal excellence.

We have the capabilities to offer comprehensive advice on both domestic
Singapore law and intricate cross-border issues, ensuring our clients receive
holistic and seamless legal support. As the preferred counsel for numerous
companies leveraging Singapore as a strategic hub for their regional operations,
our lawyers excel in managing multijurisdictional transactions and mitigating
cross-border risks with precision.

Our Singapore office is seamlessly integrated into a global network,
providing on-the-ground expertise across ASEAN countries and access to
Baker McKenzie’s expansive international network. This unique positioning
enables us to adeptly support the diverse domestic and international needs
of our clients, delivering tailored solutions that drive success in a dynamic
global market.

124 results124 results
1
of
7
12th annual awards announces winners
The Women in Business Law Awards is excited to present its shortlist for the 2022 EMEA awards.
The LMG Life Sciences Awards is excited to present its shortlist for the 2022 EMEA Awards
Managing IP has published the IP STARS 2022 trademark rankings online
The Women in Business Law Awards announces the launch of its inaugural Global Advisory Panel
The Women in Business Law Awards announces the launch of the inaugural Global Awards
The Europe, Middle East and Africa awards research cycle has now begun – don't miss out on this opportunity to get recognised
SCOTUS rejects Fintiv challenges; USPTO and JPO pledge to improve PPH; UK publishers welcome exhaustion clarity; German Adblocking copyright test fails; US court unseals Gilead anti-counterfeiting papers; Ericsson sues Apple after licence expiration
Sponsored

MIP Sponsored

  • Sponsored by Sonn & Partner
    The opponent in the case discussed in this article has owned the word mark SEVEN since 2009 and the word and design mark 7seven in a fancy script since 2014. He opposed the registration of the word mark ROOM SEVEN. All these marks were registered for identical goods in international Class 18 (bags). Among other reasons, the defendant stated that the word mark SEVEN was not used during the last five years and that he has used the mark ROOM SEVEN since 1995 in several European countries including Austria without problems. This conflict has already led to decisions in several countries. For example, the Cour d'appel de Paris did not see any danger of confusion in its decision of September 26 2017 since ROOM SEVEN will be seen by consumers as a combination in which the word SEVEN has no particular importance.
  • Sponsored by Sonn & Partner
    A hotel in a skiing area known for its bar featuring scantily-clad dancing girls was found to have an infringing trade mark. The lower courts issued an injunction in a first partial judgment. A further partial judgment was made requesting accounts of the turnover earned in connection with the running of the bar and all advertisements made for it. Accounts are the basis for all claims of compensation and damages calculations. In this case, the question was which turnovers should be included. On further appeal to the Austrian Supreme Court, the Court upheld the lower courts' judgments. It ruled on this topic as follows.
  • Sponsored by Sonn & Partner
    Until 2017, it was clear from several decisions of the Austrian Supreme Court that trade marks registered in bad faith were invalid and therefore could be successfully attacked any time and that asserted rights based on them would be rejected as immoral. However, the decisions went further: the mere use of that sign was held to be inadmissible and therefore could be forbidden as such without any other reason.
should have bg #f6f8fb but is leaving an artifact