Austria: Rendering of accounts for trade mark infringement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Austria: Rendering of accounts for trade mark infringement

Sponsored by

sonn-400px.png

A hotel in a skiing area known for its bar featuring scantily-clad dancing girls was found to have an infringing trade mark. The lower courts issued an injunction in a first partial judgment. A further partial judgment was made requesting accounts of the turnover earned in connection with the running of the bar and all advertisements made for it. Accounts are the basis for all claims of compensation and damages calculations. In this case, the question was which turnovers should be included. On further appeal to the Austrian Supreme Court, the Court upheld the lower courts' judgments. It ruled on this topic as follows.

One defence was that the order goes too far as it covers the whole year and the bar is only open during the skiing season (five months per year) and closed for the rest of the year. This defence is not applicable when the principal duty is to produce complete accounts. This defence was related to the question of whether laying out the accounts is correct, not the principal duty of a complete disclosure of the full time.

The main defence was that the turnover of the hotel itself should not be included because there is free entrance to the bar as a sales promotion and this is only one of seventeen amenities which are part of an inclusive service for the guests of the hotel. Free entrance to the bar for the customers is therefore not decisive for customers choosing the hotel. However, this defence did not convince the Supreme Court either. It is evident that the infringing trade mark had been used for the promotion of the hotel. Since it cannot be presumed that a business advertises ineffectively and uselessly this defence was refused.

A further defence was that the separate turnover of the independent girls as covered by the judgment cannot practically be known since the owner has no method of extracting any reliable figures or proof from the dancers. The Supreme Court replied that the level of difficulty is irrelevant here. The rendering of accounts in the present case is a right of the infringed, guaranteed expressly by Trademark Law without taking into account substantial difficulties in gathering reliable data or how reasonable it is to do so. Therefore, the infringer also has to make a sincere effort to ascertain the turnover of the independent dancers. They are part of the business of the bar and their turnover has to be calculated.

This decision (4Ob 130/18y) shows that once infringement is clear, the infringer cannot escape full rendering of accounts for all aspects of the infringement. All that can be done is to discuss how the consideration or damages will be calculated and which parts of the accounts have to be considered and to what extent.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn



SONN & PARTNER Patentanwälte

Riemergasse 14

A-1010 Vienna, Austria

Tel: +43 1 512 84 05

Fax: +43 1 512 98 05

office@sonn.at

www.sonn.at

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Gift this article