IBM still top patent holder – but not for long

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IBM still top patent holder – but not for long

IFI Claims Patent Services’ list of the top 50 global companies awarded the most US utility patents in 2011 ranks IBM on top for the 19th year in a row

However, that position could be in danger according to IFI’s data on published patent applications, which provides a glimpse of the market two or three years down the road.

“For the past two years, Samsung’s applications eclipsed those of IBM,” said an IFI release. “In 2011, we saw more than 5,600 published applications from Samsung versus less than 5,000 for IBM. 2010 also saw a similar result.”

The rankings also do not take into account portfolio ownership. "AT&T, for example, files its patents under multiple assignee names,” said IFI Claims Patent Services CEO Mike Baycroft.

He added: “If we look at its combined portfolio, we would discover more than 1,300 additional new patents in 2011 which would result in a much higher overall ranking. Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and the direct sale and licensing of patents all contribute to a dynamic IP landscape."

Eight of the top 10 spots and 25 of the top 50 are held by Asian firms, while US firms captured only 17. “Global companies, and especially Asian ones, are collecting US patents at a dizzying pace,” said Baycroft.

Asian countries represented in the top 50 include Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

The survey also revealed that the USPTO issued 224,505 utility patents in 2011, an increase of 2% over 2010. Despite the increase, “there appears to be a slight lessoning of patent growth among individual companies in the top 50,” said IFI. Cisco, HP, Intel, Microsoft and Oracle all saw fewer patent grants than in 2010, and 16 of the top 50 companies produced fewer patents than last year.

In 2010, only one of the top 50 received fewer than the prior year.

Apple was one of 12 “exceptional gainers”, moving up in the rankings to number 39 from number 46 last year.

IFI uses proprietary algorithms and analysis of USPTO data to compile the annual list.

Top 10 US patent recipients - 2011

1

6180

International Business Machines Corp

United States

2

4894

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd KR

Korea

3

2821

Canon K K JP

Japan

4

2559

Panasonic Corp JP

Japan

5

2483

Toshiba Corp JP

Japan

6

2311

Microsoft Corp

United States

7

2286

Sony Corp JP

Japan

8

1533

Seiko Epson Corp JP

Japan

9

1514

Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd TW

Taiwan

10

1465

Hitachi Ltd JP

Japan



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article