Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Fireworks over Bagan temples in Myanmar

Khin Yadanar Htay and Khin Myo Myo Aye of Tilleke & Gibbins summarise Myanmar’s new Geographical Indication Rules, covering application procedures, local representation requirements, and GI logo authorisation for domestic and international applicants

Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued a notification on November 21 2025 introducing the Geographical Indication Rules (the GI Rules). These regulations create a detailed administrative structure for registering and managing GIs in Myanmar, which fall primarily under the jurisdiction of the 2019 Trademark Law. The MOC concurrently published a notification outlining the mandatory forms for matters concerning GIs.

The GI Rules provide detailed procedures covering the complete GI application life cycle, encompassing application submissions, opposition proceedings, cancellation requests, invalidation actions, and the designation of local representation for GI affairs.

According to the Trademark Law and the GI Rules, entities eligible to seek GI registration with Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) include domestic and international legal organisations that officially represent defined stakeholder communities (such as producers or manufacturers of natural resources, agricultural goods, handicrafts, or industrial items), along with authorised government agencies.

Submission process

GI applications may be filed in the Myanmar language or English through electronic submission, physical delivery, or the postal service. International applicants must provide a copy of their home country’s registration certificate alongside their GI application. The certificate needs to clearly identify the GI name associated with the protected product.

A key requirement stipulates that international applicants must designate local representation in Myanmar to handle GI matters with the IPD and any appeals with the Intellectual Property Agency. The appointment document for local representatives requires proper notarisation in the applicant’s home jurisdiction to guarantee legal recognition under the GI Rules.

Authorisation to display a GI logo

The GI Rules allow any interested party, whether domestic or international, to request IPD authorisation to use the GI logo if they satisfy these conditions:

  • Active involvement in producing or commercialising the GI product or merchandise within the specified geographical region for which registration is being sought;

  • Membership in the applicant organisation; and

  • Full adherence to the specifications established for the relevant organisation or entity.

Approved applicants may display the GI logo on product stickers, labels, or packaging materials connected to the GI.

Looking ahead

Official fee schedules for GI-related services remain unannounced, and the formal launch date for accepting GI applications has not yet been disclosed. Given that both domestic and international organisations can participate in the application process, all prospective applicants should carefully examine Myanmar’s GI registration criteria and compile the required documentation in preparation for the upcoming submission window.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
Gift this article