Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Fireworks over Bagan temples in Myanmar

Khin Yadanar Htay and Khin Myo Myo Aye of Tilleke & Gibbins summarise Myanmar’s new Geographical Indication Rules, covering application procedures, local representation requirements, and GI logo authorisation for domestic and international applicants

Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued a notification on November 21 2025 introducing the Geographical Indication Rules (the GI Rules). These regulations create a detailed administrative structure for registering and managing GIs in Myanmar, which fall primarily under the jurisdiction of the 2019 Trademark Law. The MOC concurrently published a notification outlining the mandatory forms for matters concerning GIs.

The GI Rules provide detailed procedures covering the complete GI application life cycle, encompassing application submissions, opposition proceedings, cancellation requests, invalidation actions, and the designation of local representation for GI affairs.

According to the Trademark Law and the GI Rules, entities eligible to seek GI registration with Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) include domestic and international legal organisations that officially represent defined stakeholder communities (such as producers or manufacturers of natural resources, agricultural goods, handicrafts, or industrial items), along with authorised government agencies.

Submission process

GI applications may be filed in the Myanmar language or English through electronic submission, physical delivery, or the postal service. International applicants must provide a copy of their home country’s registration certificate alongside their GI application. The certificate needs to clearly identify the GI name associated with the protected product.

A key requirement stipulates that international applicants must designate local representation in Myanmar to handle GI matters with the IPD and any appeals with the Intellectual Property Agency. The appointment document for local representatives requires proper notarisation in the applicant’s home jurisdiction to guarantee legal recognition under the GI Rules.

Authorisation to display a GI logo

The GI Rules allow any interested party, whether domestic or international, to request IPD authorisation to use the GI logo if they satisfy these conditions:

  • Active involvement in producing or commercialising the GI product or merchandise within the specified geographical region for which registration is being sought;

  • Membership in the applicant organisation; and

  • Full adherence to the specifications established for the relevant organisation or entity.

Approved applicants may display the GI logo on product stickers, labels, or packaging materials connected to the GI.

Looking ahead

Official fee schedules for GI-related services remain unannounced, and the formal launch date for accepting GI applications has not yet been disclosed. Given that both domestic and international organisations can participate in the application process, all prospective applicants should carefully examine Myanmar’s GI registration criteria and compile the required documentation in preparation for the upcoming submission window.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article