Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Myanmar releases GI regulations and application documents

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Fireworks over Bagan temples in Myanmar

Khin Yadanar Htay and Khin Myo Myo Aye of Tilleke & Gibbins summarise Myanmar’s new Geographical Indication Rules, covering application procedures, local representation requirements, and GI logo authorisation for domestic and international applicants

Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued a notification on November 21 2025 introducing the Geographical Indication Rules (the GI Rules). These regulations create a detailed administrative structure for registering and managing GIs in Myanmar, which fall primarily under the jurisdiction of the 2019 Trademark Law. The MOC concurrently published a notification outlining the mandatory forms for matters concerning GIs.

The GI Rules provide detailed procedures covering the complete GI application life cycle, encompassing application submissions, opposition proceedings, cancellation requests, invalidation actions, and the designation of local representation for GI affairs.

According to the Trademark Law and the GI Rules, entities eligible to seek GI registration with Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) include domestic and international legal organisations that officially represent defined stakeholder communities (such as producers or manufacturers of natural resources, agricultural goods, handicrafts, or industrial items), along with authorised government agencies.

Submission process

GI applications may be filed in the Myanmar language or English through electronic submission, physical delivery, or the postal service. International applicants must provide a copy of their home country’s registration certificate alongside their GI application. The certificate needs to clearly identify the GI name associated with the protected product.

A key requirement stipulates that international applicants must designate local representation in Myanmar to handle GI matters with the IPD and any appeals with the Intellectual Property Agency. The appointment document for local representatives requires proper notarisation in the applicant’s home jurisdiction to guarantee legal recognition under the GI Rules.

Authorisation to display a GI logo

The GI Rules allow any interested party, whether domestic or international, to request IPD authorisation to use the GI logo if they satisfy these conditions:

  • Active involvement in producing or commercialising the GI product or merchandise within the specified geographical region for which registration is being sought;

  • Membership in the applicant organisation; and

  • Full adherence to the specifications established for the relevant organisation or entity.

Approved applicants may display the GI logo on product stickers, labels, or packaging materials connected to the GI.

Looking ahead

Official fee schedules for GI-related services remain unannounced, and the formal launch date for accepting GI applications has not yet been disclosed. Given that both domestic and international organisations can participate in the application process, all prospective applicants should carefully examine Myanmar’s GI registration criteria and compile the required documentation in preparation for the upcoming submission window.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A new claim filed by Ericsson, and a request for access to documents, were also among recent developments
Cooley and Stikeman Elliott advised 35Pharma on the deal, which will allow GSK to get its hands on S235, an investigational medicine for pulmonary hypertension
Simon Wright explains why the UK should embrace the possibility of rejoining the UPC, and reveals how CIPA is reacting to this month’s historic Emotional Perception AI case at the UK Supreme Court
Matthew Grady of Wolf Greenfield says AI presents an opportunity in patent practice for stronger collaboration between in-house and outside counsel
Aparna Watal, head of trademarks at Halfords IP, discusses why lawyers must take a stand when advising clients and how she balances work, motherhood and mentoring
Discussion hosted by Bird & Bird partners also hears that UK courts’ desire to determine FRAND rates could see the jurisdiction penalised in a similar way to China
The platform’s proactive intellectual property enforcement helps brands spot and kill fakes, so they can focus on growth. Managing IP learns more about the programme
Hire of José María del Valle Escalante to lead the firm’s operations in ‘dynamic’ Catalonia and Aragon regions follows last month’s appointment of a new chief information officer
The London elite have dominated IP litigation wins for the past 10 years, but a recent bombshell AI case could change all that
Two New Hampshire IP boutiques will soon merge to form Secant IP, seeking to scale patent strength while keeping a lean cost model
Gift this article