How small brands are fighting counterfeits with Temu’s Brand Guardian Initiative

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How small brands are fighting counterfeits with Temu’s Brand Guardian Initiative

Mobile phone being held with a Temu-branded package in the background

The platform’s proactive intellectual property enforcement helps brands spot and kill fakes, so they can focus on growth. Managing IP learns more about the programme

For years, Eye Candy Pigments owner Jeff Bergmann policed counterfeits of his art supplies across e-commerce platforms, filing takedown requests that drew mostly automated replies.

Minnesota-based RedRock Distribution faced the same problem in protecting its gas cartridges. The counterfeits undercut sales and pose serious reputational and safety risks.

“We were spending hours every week trying to report and remove fake listings,” said Ryan Feeny, operating partner at RedRock.

For smaller brands with limited resources, protecting intellectual property (IP) can be a grind. Counterfeit listings often reappear quickly, and chasing them down frequently descends into an unending game of Whac-A-Mole, straining operations and creating reputational risk.

Temu’s Brand Guardian Initiative

Eye Candy and RedRock reported significant improvements after joining Temu’s Brand Guardian Initiative (BGI), which launched in April 2024. The programme proactively embeds trademark and other IP assets into its protection system for quicker spotting and removal of suspected violations. BGI serves brands whether or not they are selling on the platform, providing each with a dedicated representative for one-on-one support through tutorials, takedown help, and handling of complex IP cases. More than 1,500 brands have enrolled.

The programme is part of Temu’s broader IP enforcement approach, which includes:

  • Comprehensive seller vetting and compliance training;

  • 24/7 algorithmic monitoring paired with manual review;

  • A dedicated IP protection portal and brand registry to streamline takedown submissions; and

  • An internal enforcement team that handles claims efficiently.

Temu says it resolves 99% of takedown requests within three business days, with an average response time of under 24 hours.

“Protecting the IP of legitimate rights holders is a top priority for Temu and we have invested continuously in technology and human resources to build our IP protection programme,” a Temu spokesperson said.

Temu also works with global IP organisations, including the International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition (IACC) and INTA. It participates in industry forums to share best practices and improve enforcement worldwide.

Better enforcement drives business growth

Since joining the BGI, RedRock Distribution has saved hours each week with automatic takedowns.

“Counterfeit listings that used to appear regularly are now caught and removed quickly, often before they reach customers,” Feeny said. “We now have a direct line of communication with a responsive support team, and takedown times are much faster compared to other platforms.”

Eye Candy Pigments’ Bergmann said the programme gives him stronger control over his brand.

“I see this partnership continuing to grow, with even stronger collaboration and opportunities to expand my brand presence on Temu,” he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article