Monthly report: March 2023’s exclusive content

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Monthly report: March 2023’s exclusive content

exclusive march-comp.jpg

Managing IP was the first to report major stories that matter, from more twists in the EUIPO saga to EPO quality assessments

Archambeau loses key powers over EUIPO contract row

The drama at the EUIPO continued to escalate last month. Reporter Rory O’Neill revealed that the office had suspended key administrative powers held by executive director Christian Archambeau.

Jorma Hanski, chairperson of the EUIPO management board, sent an email to EUIPO staff on March 7 to inform them of the news.

The decision was taken at an extraordinary meeting of the management board on March 6 after Archambeau filed a claim for compensation over the non-renewal of his contract.

Archambeau is seeking compensation worth €400,000 ($426,000) in lost earnings and €75,000 in damages, sources with knowledge of the meeting told Managing IP.

The story quickly became one of Managing IP’s most read of the last few years.

Click here to read the full article.

Council chasing EUIPO for Archambeau assessment

Later in March, it was revealed that the Council of the EU is chasing the EUIPO management board for an assessment of Christian Archambeau’s performance as executive director.

The council told the management board in a letter dated March 22, and seen by Managing IP, that it needed the assessment to decide whether Archambeau should get another term.

The council, which has ultimate oversight over the EUIPO, has yet to formally ratify that decision.

Click here to read the full article.

EPO under fire from staff reps amid IPQC criticisms

Sticking with IP offices, the debate over patent quality at the EPO continued to simmer last month after a staff committee backed a group of in-house counsel’s claims that patent quality standards are in decline.

Reporter Rory O’Neill revealed that the office’s central staff committee (CSC), which represents EPO staff in consultative meetings with management, had published an internal bulletin at the end of February backing criticisms by a group of in-house counsel called the Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC).

The CSC said EPO management has focused on productivity gains over substantive quality for the past decade.

Meanwhile, the report also revealed that the EPO has offered a follow-up meeting with the IPQC. The two met initially on February 3 to discuss the group’s claims that the EPO no longer prioritises full search and examination over speedy patent grants.

Click here to read the full article.

India opens legal market to foreign law firms

Away from Europe, our Asia reporter was among the first to cast her eye over proposals by the Bar Council of India to finally open its legal market to foreign law firms and practitioners.

The Gazette of India published an update by the Bar Council of India on March 13 which stipulated that such lawyers and firms will also be eligible to open offices in India.

Whether the government should open the Indian legal sector to foreign law firms has been a contentious issue for several years.

Under the new rules, foreign lawyers can practise IP as well as work on transactional and corporate cases and contractual issues. They are, however, prohibited from participating in litigation.

Click here to read the full article.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article