Exclusive: EPO to meet in-house critics to discuss quality
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Exclusive: EPO to meet in-house critics to discuss quality


Members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter had criticised the office for failing to engage with their concerns over patent quality

The EPO has agreed to meet with a group of in-house counsel at major corporations to discuss concerns over the quality of patents granted by the office, Managing IP can confirm.

An EPO spokesperson said yesterday, January 10, that the office would meet with members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC) to discuss specific examples of where quality did not meet their expectations.

Counsel at companies including Bayer, Siemens, Nokia, Ericsson, and Volvo set up the group last year and pledged to focus on quality over quantity in their own patent filings.

The EPO spokesperson said: “We hope to receive these examples soon and will arrange a meeting in the coming weeks at which any examples can be discussed.”

Members of the IPQC held a roundtable last month to discuss patent quality standards at the EPO. They concluded that the quality of patents had been sacrificed in favour of quick processing targets.

Members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter have been critical of the EPO for not engaging properly with their concerns. The office did not send a representative to last month’s roundtable.

The office had previously contacted signatories to the charter individually, but until now has not agreed to a joint meeting.

The EPO spokesperson told Managing IP its focus is on a complete and accurate search, and a thorough examination”.

“Our data and feedback from interviews with over 6,000 applicants through our regular user satisfaction survey demonstrate that we continue to provide a high-quality service,” the spokesperson added.

A date for the meeting has not been set.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Mercedes-Benz, Dolby Laboratories, and Panasonic discuss the merits and drawbacks of the USPTO's terminal disclaimer proposal
In-house counsel believe Chinese domestic firms are becoming as sophisticated as international firms, but they may not shift their portfolios just yet
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is looking to renew a ban that has prevented Judge Pauline Newman from hearing cases
The list of the top representative firms at the UPC may yield few surprises but their success did not come free
The German firms have accounted for 26% of all infringement actions, while US corporations appear interested in litigating at the forum, a report has revealed
Vincent Brault tells us how he fits kitesurfing into his lunchtime routine and why IP is no longer seen as ‘nerdy’
Gift this article