India opens legal market to foreign law firms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India opens legal market to foreign law firms

India on map.jpeg

Foreign firms and lawyers, including IP practitioners, can now practise in India after years of talk and no action

The Bar Council of India is to allow foreign lawyers and law firms including those dealing with intellectual property issues to operate in India, according to new rules published on Monday, March 13.

The Gazette of India published an update by the Bar Council of India which stipulated that such lawyers and firms will also be eligible to open offices in India.

Whether the government should open the Indian legal sector to foreign law firms has been a contentious issue for several years.

Under the new rules, foreign lawyers can practise IP as well as work on transactional and corporate cases and contractual issues. They are, however, prohibited from participating in litigation.

The Bar Council of India said allowing non-domestic lawyers practising foreign law, international legal issues in non-litigious matters, and arbitration cases to operate in India would help the legal profession in India to grow.

Local lawyers say it’s unclear whether foreign professionals would only be allowed to practise issues related to foreign and international law or if they could advise on Indian law despite being banned from actively participating in litigation.

The Bar Council said it will publish more guidance in the coming days.

Foreign lawyers and law firms must register with the Bar Council to practise in the country.

However, that requirement does not apply to foreign practitioners who occasionally come to India on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis to advise clients, an option some foreign practitioners have taken for several years.

According to the notice, registration fees for foreign lawyers and law firms are $25,000 and $50,000, respectively. Such registrations are valid for five years and are renewable.

While a small handful of international law firms have previously tried to establish their presence in India, they have had to do that by incorporating local entities that operate independently but which bear the international firm’s brand name.

Some local law firms also have exclusive referral arrangements with foreign firms.

But with the new rules in place, foreign firms can finally open official offices in India.

Managing IP will publish analysis on what the rules mean for foreign law firms planning to enter the Indian market in the coming weeks.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Stephen Yang joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why his role requires him to wear many hats
The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
Litigator Neel Chatterjee, who has joined the firm as a co-leader of the IP team, reveals tech ambitions and expansion plans
A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
Gift this article