India opens legal market to foreign law firms
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India opens legal market to foreign law firms

India on map.jpeg

Foreign firms and lawyers, including IP practitioners, can now practise in India after years of talk and no action

The Bar Council of India is to allow foreign lawyers and law firms including those dealing with intellectual property issues to operate in India, according to new rules published on Monday, March 13.

The Gazette of India published an update by the Bar Council of India which stipulated that such lawyers and firms will also be eligible to open offices in India.

Whether the government should open the Indian legal sector to foreign law firms has been a contentious issue for several years.

Under the new rules, foreign lawyers can practise IP as well as work on transactional and corporate cases and contractual issues. They are, however, prohibited from participating in litigation.

The Bar Council of India said allowing non-domestic lawyers practising foreign law, international legal issues in non-litigious matters, and arbitration cases to operate in India would help the legal profession in India to grow.

Local lawyers say it’s unclear whether foreign professionals would only be allowed to practise issues related to foreign and international law or if they could advise on Indian law despite being banned from actively participating in litigation.

The Bar Council said it will publish more guidance in the coming days.

Foreign lawyers and law firms must register with the Bar Council to practise in the country.

However, that requirement does not apply to foreign practitioners who occasionally come to India on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis to advise clients, an option some foreign practitioners have taken for several years.

According to the notice, registration fees for foreign lawyers and law firms are $25,000 and $50,000, respectively. Such registrations are valid for five years and are renewable.

While a small handful of international law firms have previously tried to establish their presence in India, they have had to do that by incorporating local entities that operate independently but which bear the international firm’s brand name.

Some local law firms also have exclusive referral arrangements with foreign firms.

But with the new rules in place, foreign firms can finally open official offices in India.

Managing IP will publish analysis on what the rules mean for foreign law firms planning to enter the Indian market in the coming weeks.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article