India opens legal market to foreign law firms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India opens legal market to foreign law firms

India on map.jpeg

Foreign firms and lawyers, including IP practitioners, can now practise in India after years of talk and no action

The Bar Council of India is to allow foreign lawyers and law firms including those dealing with intellectual property issues to operate in India, according to new rules published on Monday, March 13.

The Gazette of India published an update by the Bar Council of India which stipulated that such lawyers and firms will also be eligible to open offices in India.

Whether the government should open the Indian legal sector to foreign law firms has been a contentious issue for several years.

Under the new rules, foreign lawyers can practise IP as well as work on transactional and corporate cases and contractual issues. They are, however, prohibited from participating in litigation.

The Bar Council of India said allowing non-domestic lawyers practising foreign law, international legal issues in non-litigious matters, and arbitration cases to operate in India would help the legal profession in India to grow.

Local lawyers say it’s unclear whether foreign professionals would only be allowed to practise issues related to foreign and international law or if they could advise on Indian law despite being banned from actively participating in litigation.

The Bar Council said it will publish more guidance in the coming days.

Foreign lawyers and law firms must register with the Bar Council to practise in the country.

However, that requirement does not apply to foreign practitioners who occasionally come to India on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis to advise clients, an option some foreign practitioners have taken for several years.

According to the notice, registration fees for foreign lawyers and law firms are $25,000 and $50,000, respectively. Such registrations are valid for five years and are renewable.

While a small handful of international law firms have previously tried to establish their presence in India, they have had to do that by incorporating local entities that operate independently but which bear the international firm’s brand name.

Some local law firms also have exclusive referral arrangements with foreign firms.

But with the new rules in place, foreign firms can finally open official offices in India.

Managing IP will publish analysis on what the rules mean for foreign law firms planning to enter the Indian market in the coming weeks.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Developments included a stay in a row concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction and a timeline for the rollout of the long-awaited new CMS
Jorg Thomaier, who has been head of IP at the German pharma company since 2010, will leave later this year and hand the reins to the company’s head of patents
Why companies must conduct thorough IP due diligence – even if it may not be mandatory
Celia Cheah at Wong & Partners in Malaysia says she is aiming to tap into the Baker McKenzie member firm’s international network and expand its IP portfolio
A team of partners that joined Boies Schiller Flexner say they would like to double the firm’s patent litigation capabilities
Iris Quadrio at Marval O’Farrell & Mairal discusses mentors, volunteering, and leadership in our latest interview to mark women leaders in IP
Abigail Struthers discusses why law firms are like a mix of small businesses and explains why hopeful patent lawyers should not assume that a science degree is essential
We review the latest batch of IP STARS rankings, analyse a major law firm collaboration following the opening of India’s legal market, and look at why Canadian brands are promoting ‘Canadianness’
Counsel explain how the USPTO’s decision to discretionarily deny institution of a PTAB case affects their advice to clients
Gift this article