Exclusive: Archambeau loses key powers over EUIPO contract row

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Exclusive: Archambeau loses key powers over EUIPO contract row

C_Archambeau_02.jpg

The EUIPO management board has suspended some of the executive director's powers after he demanded compensation for the non-renewal of his mandate

  • Details of shock decision from EUIPO management board

  • Inside insight into contract row that led to yesterday's meeting

The EUIPO has suspended key administrative powers held by executive director Christian Archambeau, Managing IP can reveal.

Jorma Hanski, chairperson of the EUIPO management board, sent an email to EUIPO staff this morning, March 7, to inform them of the news.

The decision was taken at an extraordinary meeting of the management board yesterday, March 6, after Archambeau filed a claim for compensation over the non-renewal of his contract.

Archambeau is seeking compensation worth €400,000 ($426,000) in lost earnings and €75,000 in damages, sources with knowledge of the meeting told Managing IP.

The advertised salary for Archambeau's successor is €211,680 per annum.

From now until the end of his term in October, Archambeau will no longer be able to authorise contracts on behalf of the EUIPO and exercise other key powers as a result of the row.

Hanski wrote: “I would like to inform you in line with Article 4(f) of Decision MB-17-01 that the management board decided to temporarily suspend the powers of the appointing authority (AIPN) and of the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment (AACC), delegated by the management board to the executive director.

“The suspension takes effect as of today, 7 March 2023, until the end of executive director’s mandate.”

The AIPN powers are conferred on the executive director by the management board, in line with the EU staff regulations.

The suspended duties assigned to Archambeau will now be carried out by Hanski until a new executive director is appointed.

Archambeau, a Belgian national, has served as EUIPO executive director since October 2018 but will depart the post later this year.

Last November, a joint meeting of the management board and budget committee voted to remove Archambeau at the end of his contract in October 2023.

At that meeting, Archambeau faced criticism over the slump in EU trademark filings last year and the financial repercussions for national intellectual property offices.

The EUIPO’s poorer-than-expected financial performance last year will mean that, under EUIPO rules, the office cannot deliver lucrative offsetting payments to member states in 2024.

These payments compensate member states for the costs of administering the EU trademark system.

There are three known candidates to replace Archambeau as executive director, each with government support – Italy’s Andrea Di Carlo, Portugal’s João Negrão, and France’s Etienne Sanz de Acedo.

A pre-selection panel will interview candidates and submit at least three names for consideration by the management board at its next scheduled meeting in June.

The board's pick is then subject to formal approval by the European Council.

Archambeau declined to comment on this story when contacted by Managing IP.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Gift this article