New Designs Act comes into force

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Designs Act comes into force

The Industrial Designs Act 1996 of Malaysia (IDA) was passed in September 1996 and is expected to come into force on September 1 1999. The IDA will introduce an independent regime for the protection of industrial designs in Malaysia repealing existing legislation which allows for the automatic protection of industrial designs obtained in the UK under the UK Designs Act 1949.

With the coming into force of the IDA it will be possible to file national and convention applications for new designs in Malaysia. Priority can also be claimed based on a corresponding application filed within six months in a Paris Convention country. Applications filed within the transitional period of 12 months after the coming into force of the IDA will be entitled to claim the priority date of UK design applications pending on the date the IDA comes into force.

The definition of a design and the basic requirements for registration remain the same as under the UK Designs Act 1949. The test of novelty however is confined to disclosure within Malaysia. Disclosures in official exhibitions and unauthorised disclosure will also not defeat novelty if made within six months before the filing date. The IDA seems to suggest that an application will be examined only as to formalities. However formal requirements are not defined in the Act which merely states that the same will be defined in the upcoming Regulations. The term of registration is 15 years from the filing date with an initial term of five years renewable for two further five year terms. Existing UK registrations will, subject to procedures and fees to be prescribed in the Regulations, continue to enjoy protection for a full period of 25 years.

Entitlements to a registered design by virtue of an assignment, transmission or other operation of law will be ineffective against third parties unless recorded in the register of industrial designs.

The IDA provides a right of action for infringement of a registered design but no criminal offences. An action must be brought within a limitation period of 5 years from the date of infringement. A defence of innocent infringement is available to an infringer who proves that he was unaware that the design was registered despite reasonable steps taken to determine the same, disentitling the registered proprietor from claiming damages.

appears that registration may be easier to obtain under the IDA as applications are to be examined only as to formalities. However the IDA does provide for revocation of a registered design for lack of novelty. There are also provisions for the grant of a compulsory licence where the design in not applied in Malaysia by any industrial process to the article in respect of which it is registered. With the coming into force of the IDA, It will be possible to file applications for registration directly in Malaysia and protection will be dependant on whether there has been disclosure within Malaysia itself.

se are welcome changes. We now await the publication of the Regulations for the application procedures and fees to be applicable in Malaysia.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A David v Goliath battle involving TikTok, and Via Licensing Alliance adding new members to its Voice Codec patent pool, were also among the top talking points
Latham & Watkins bolstered its IP litigation bench in California with the addition of Kieran Kieckhefer, as partner demand for trial-ready expertise shows no sign of slowing
With the launch of a new patent eligibility AI tool, Sterne Kessler is leading a growing movement of law firms taking AI development into their own hands
UPC cases are (very) gradually becoming more distributed across other local divisions outside Germany, which can only be good news for the pan-European forum
Clarification concerning jurisdictional reach and latest stats released by the court were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
Although unanimous decision by the top court clarifies several aspects of the honest concurrent use defence, practitioners say ambiguities remain
Tristan Sherliker says he hopes to solve an access to justice issue by making the automated court bundle tool free to use
The team, comprising two partners and one senior consultant, plans to offer “highly differentiated” services to clients
HGF’s new ownership model frees it from the hiring constraints of traditional partnerships, its CEO told Managing IP
New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Gift this article