Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

A group of 10 record companies including EMI, Sony and Universal and Warner Music have won an order requiring the six largest UK internet service providers to block three Bittorrent indexing services

The order was granted today by Mr Justice Arnold, after he found that the Court had jurisdiction. He said the Court needed to satisfy four questions: (1) are the defendants service providers? (2) are the users and/or the operators of the websites infringing copyright? (3) do the users and/or the operators of the websites use the defendants' services to do that? (4) do the defendants have actual knowledge of this? Reviewing the facts and the law, he answered yes to each question.

The three Bittorrent indexing sites blocked are KAT, H33T and Fenopy. The ruling follows similar decisions involving Newzbin and Dramatico.

Since those decisions, the Austrian Supreme Court has referred two questions to the CJEU concerning infringement by users and operators (Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH). Arnold reviewed those questions but decided they did not affect the result of this case.

The music companies were represented by barristers Ian Mill QC, Edmund Cullen QC, Tom Richards and Shane Sibbel and law firm Forbes Anderson Free.

The ISPs (BSkyB, BT, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, Telefonica and Virgin Media) were not represented.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article