Spain: Strategies for plant protection
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Strategies for plant protection

The tension in the relationship between patent rights and plant breeder's rights (PBR) is widely known. Recently, some EU member states have opposed the decision taken by the Enlarged Board of Appeals of the European Patent Office (EPO) in cases G2/12 and G2/13 .

G2/12 and G2/13 concluded that plants obtained by an essentially biological process, excluded from patentability according to Article 53(b) EPC, are not excluded from patentability, but in December 2016 the EPO decided to stay all proceedings in examination and opposition cases in which the invention was a plant or animal obtained by an essentially biological process. This decision was taken following the discussion on the recent Notice of the European Commission related to the exclusion from patentability of said plants interpreted from the Biopatent Directive (98/44/EC) and supported by Spain jointly with Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Switzerland.

If finally the EPO follows the interpretation offered by the European Commission Notice, PBRs would be the main route of the protection of plants derived from essentially biological processes.

In order to obtain PBRs, the plant material must be novel, distinct, stable and homogeneous, but also it must be assigned a valid variety denomination. Since time elapsed between the application date and the grant of PBRs, it is advisable to protect this denomination simultaneously as a trade mark but taking into account proceeding of the Guidelines established by the Community and national regulations. At European Community level, at the time the PBR is granted, the trade mark will be annulled since the variety denomination would be generic. Nevertheless, the breeder would have the exclusive right to prevent third parties with an identical or similar denomination during this period. At national level, in Spain, according to the Article 48.4 of the Law No 3/2000, the applicant must undertake to waive the Spanish trade mark rights at the time the PBR is granted.

It is also remarkable that, according to article 19 of the Spanish Regulation (Real Decreto) No 1261/2005 which approves the regulation of protection of plant varieties, it is necessary to register in the corresponding Spanish Ministry a Community plant variety licence contract to ensure that infringements of the corresponding national PBRs are equally applicable to infringements of the Community PBRs. From 2005, the licences of exploitation of PBRs have shown a clear and surprising upward movement, indicating that the PBRs generated by the breeding sector are growing strongly in this country.

Rafa Lopez

Esther Rubio

PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
In the latest episode, the team discusses the battle to take control of listed company and IP business Qantm IP, and looks at some recent hiring trends
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, lawyers explain how they manage their mental health, and how they pluck up the courage to ask themselves difficult questions
IP lawyers unpick a case heard at the CJEU’s Grand Chamber this week that could potentially create a new world for litigation in Europe
A lawyer who replied to a cease-and-desist letter with just two words has shown others how to deal with vexatious infringement allegations
The suggested rule change surrounding terminal disclaimers could ease the burden on defendants, but risks complicating prosecution strategies
Gift this article