Five minutes with ... Patricia Revuelta, Abril Abogados
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five minutes with ... Patricia Revuelta, Abril Abogados

Patricia 5 mins sq.jpg

Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Patricia Revuelta, attorney at Abril Abogados in Spain

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I normally say that I am an intellectual property attorney at law, but I always add “I deal with trademarks, patents and copyright,” as people do not usually know what IP includes.

If the conversation goes further, then I say that I specialise in the prosecution and defence of EU Trademarks (EUTMs). I am involved in the whole process from conducting the necessary searches, filing the application, reporting possible oppositions, dealing with negotiations with the adverse party, preparing the written statements, filing appeals before the EUIPO’s Boards of Appeal and attending oral hearings at the EU General Court.

Talk us through a typical working day.

I never have a typical day at the office, that is why I am never bored. This does not mean that some days are not complicated!

I reply to clients’ emails providing legal assessments, report oppositions, appeals and comment on the chances of success in proceedings. I look for the best registration strategies to preserve the client’s rights and commercial interests.

At least twice a week, I have calls or personal meetings with potential new overseas clients.

What are you working on at the moment?

I am acting for one of the most famous US footwear companies in the world by trying to fight against an EUTM application filed by a Chinese company that intends to take unfair advantage of the distinctive character and repute of our client’s mark.

The nature of reputation implies a certain degree of knowledge of the mark among the public and it is not always easy to compile the necessary evidence that complies with the requirements set out in the EUTM Regulation. It is challenging, exciting and stressful at the same time.

Can you see why I am never bored?

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

I am always dealing with different things, but imminent deadlines and urgent enquiries of key accounts always take priority.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

The most exciting aspect is finding new clients. We invest a lot of economic and personal resources to find new clients and opportunities. We attend international conferences, and we are involved in different associations that demand a lot of time not only from our working days but from our spare time as well. Receiving the fruits of this work and efforts, in the form of new clients, is very satisfying.

Personally, the most stressful aspect is dealing with imminent deadlines after having received the client’s instructions at the very last minute. I am very self-demanding with my work, and I hate doing things in a rush without having had time enough to search for more pertinent or updated case law.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

You have to be flexible, and patient with clients and with your team. Never forget that the client’s interests are the main priority and that “a bad agreement is always better than a good trial”.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

Sometimes IP can be very ungrateful. A sole human mistake can entail the loss of a client’s trust and your reputation. Dealing every day with deadlines can bring very stressful situations that can harm your mental health at work.

I hereby take the opportunity to urge all IP firms to implement clear and effective policies to improve the workload of employees, so they can avoid burnout and reach a balance between their professional and personal life.

What or who inspires you?

I cannot mention only one thing or person. I have become a partner at my firm thanks to the support of all of my colleagues, family and friends.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

I would have probably been involved in the defence of abused women. But if I had a lot of money in another life, I would very likely invest in a travel agency, restaurants and nightlife entertainment.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Don’t be so self-demanding and strict with yourself. Mistakes are part of our lives and each error entails a lesson. Stop looking for perfection.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article