UK government wants your views on copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK government wants your views on copyright

The UK government has published detailed proposals to clarify and extend copyright exceptions, in response to this year’s Hargreaves Review on intellectual property

The government wants businesses to provide "thoughts and evidence" on the wide-ranging reforms during a consultation period that will last until March 21 next year.

Most of the proposals concern copyright exceptions.

The government proposes creating a private copying exception. This would make it legal to copy a CD on to an MP3 player, something that many users do already.

It also wants to introduce an exception for parody and pastiche, which it says will give greater creative freedom to comedians.

The exception for non-commercial research will be widened to allow data mining, and exceptions affecting education, quotation and people with disabilities will be updated.

In addition, the government wants to establish licensing and clearance procedures for orphan works, to open them up for consumers and researchers, and to provide for voluntary extended collective licensing schemes.

These schemes, similar to those that exist in Scandinavia, would allow collecting societies to license rights on behalf of all rights owners in a sector, apart from those who have opted out.

The proposals closely follow the recommendations made in the Hargreaves Review, published on May 19. They were endorsed by Vince Cable, the business minister, in August.

Baroness Wilcox, minister for IP, said in a statement today that "some freeing up of existing copyright legislation can deliver real value to the UK economy without risking our excellent creative industries".

The Hargreaves Review was commissioned following concerns, including those expressed by Prime Minister David Cameron, that the UK might not offer a conducive climate to new technology businesses such as Google.

It is likely to attract a lot of comments. Groups representing consumers will probably welcome the proposals to clarify exceptions, but some copyright owners might feel they go too far. For example, academic publishers are known to have reservations about the data mining proposals.

There may also be concerns about overlap between national and EU or international legislation. For example, the European Commission is also planning a directive dealing with orphan works.

Another Hargreaves recommendation was the creation of a digital copyright exchange. Last month the government appointed Richard Hooper to run a feasibility study on this issue.

More information on the consultation, including the response form, is available on the IPO website. Responses can be sent to David Burgess at the IPO by email.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
Gift this article