Japan: Analysing the PD-1 antibody patent litigation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan: Analysing the PD-1 antibody patent litigation

The PD-1 antibody patent litigation, globally filed in Japan, the United States and Europe, came to an end with a settlement.

japan

Summary of the case

According to the press releases of Ono pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as others, the facts are as follows.

Ono and Professor Tasuku Honjo (distinguished professor at Kyoto University) are co-patentees of a patent for an invention entitled "An immunopotentiative composition" (JP 4409430, Patent No. 1), and a patent for an invention entitled "monoclonal antibody" (JP 5159730, Patent No. 2).

Claim 1 of Patent No. 1 is as follows.

Claim 1

An agent for treatment of melanoma comprising a PD-1 antibody as an active ingredient, the agent having effect of suppressing proliferation or metastasis of melanoma in vivo.

Claim 1 of Patent No. 2 is as follows.

Claim 1

An agent for treatment of cancer comprising a PD-1 antibody as an active ingredient, the agent having effect of suppressing proliferation of cancer cells in vivo (except for an agent for treatment of melanoma).

On October 24 2016, Ono and Professor Honjo filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction for patent infringement at the Tokyo District Court on the basis of infringement of Patent No. 1 and No. 2 against Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), which obtained a manufacturing and marketing approval of Keytruda® (pembrolizumab MK-3475) on September 28 2016.

The European and US patents corresponding to Patent No. 1 and No. 2 are licensed to Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), and lawsuits based on such patents are pending in Europe as well as in the US. Furthermore, Ono and BMS have announced that they do not seek a judicial decision on sales suspension of Keytruda® in these lawsuits, if the litigant parties make an agreement to pay appropriate consideration including royalties or if such order is made by the court, taking into consideration the characteristics of this type of therapy helping patients' lives. They will take such an approach in this lawsuit as well.

On January 21 2017, Ono issued a press release stating that Ono and BMS entered into a settlement and licence agreement with Merck (US) and its associated companies.

They reached the following agreements:

Ono and BMS allow sales of Merck's Keytruda® after recognising validity of their use patents and product patents.

Merck makes an initial payment of $625 million to Ono and BMS, and pays ongoing royalties on global sales of Keytruda of 6.5 % from January 1 2017 until December 31 2023, and 2.5 % from January 1 2024 until December 31 2026.

The initial payment and royalties will be shared between BMS and Ono in a 75/25 per cent allocation, respectively.

By this settlement, all global patent infringement litigation against Merck's sale of Keytruda® was ended.

"Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono's agreement with Merck protects our scientific discoveries and validates the strong intellectual property rights we secured as the early innovators in the science of PD-1, a key mechanism in Immuno-Oncology that has proven to have transformational impact in cancer care," says Giovanni Caforio, M.D., chief executive officer, BMS. "Today's agreement is also a good decision for patients as it supports the continuation of ongoing research and maintains access to anti-PD-1 therapies for cancer patients around the world."

Practical tips

The attempt of cancer treatment to step on the accelerator of immunity has not succeeded. In contrast, the cancer immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors, which prevents the brakes from being applied to immunity, is a breakthrough because it is highly likely to be effective against various kind of cancers, cancers are less likely to recur, since it is effective for a long period after administration is stopped and its mechanism is to activate the immune system without attacking cancer cells directly, therefore side effects are less severe, if any.

After a generation of the therapy with PD-1 antibody, cancer treatment has turned a significant corner. "We're at the point where we've discovered the cancer equivalent of penicillin," says Dan Chen, head of cancer at Genentech (Andy Coghlan, Closing in on Cancer, New Scientist, March 5 2016). A generation of antibiotics overcame infections in the 20th century, now in the 21st century, there is a possibility that cancers will be cured by immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors. Professor Honjo was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2018 due to this achievement.

This litigation was withdrawn about three months after filing, and the trial did not proceed substantially. MSD has not yet obtained a manufacturing and marketing approval for the products with "unresectable advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer" effectiveness and efficacy among MSD's products, and argued that since those with "unresectable melanoma" effectiveness and efficacy have not yet been included in the NHI price listing, there is no likelihood of infringement, therefore, there is no benefit in a suit. MSD argued that there is no urgency or necessity for the resolution of the dispute by a lawsuit for demand of an injunction, since Ono etc. have announced that they will not seek a judicial decision on sales suspension of MSD's product, if appropriate consideration is paid by MSD. This is a case where the significance of pharmaceutical companies' existence, whose mission is to save patients, was questioned in patent litigation.

Abe_Takanori

Takanori Abe

ABE & Partners

Matsushita IMP Building

1-3-7, Shiromi, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0001, Japan

Tel: +81 6 6949 1496

Fax: +81 6 6949 1487

abe@abe-law.com

www.abe-law.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article