Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 19,792 results that match your search.19,792 results
  • Five in-house counsel from Sanofi, USG and other companies reveal how to sway the board to deny IPR institution
  • Managing IP is seeking in-house counsel views on the state of diversity and inclusion within the IP profession and how it can be improved
  • Germany’s Federal Court of Justice has ruled that long-tail trade marks are generally devoid of distinctive character. Jens Matthes and Christian W Liedtke examine five key points from the decision and provide three tips for applicants
  • Andrea Allan and Sean McGuire of Watermark examine some recent court cases involving trade secrets and confidential information
  • On January 17 2009, the regulations of Legislative Decree No 1072 regarding the "Pharmaceutical Test Data Protection and other undisclosed data of pharmaceutical products" were published in the Peruvian gazette, El Peruano.
  • “It was not very helpful”. That was Michael Silverleaf QC’s summary of the High Court’s ruling in Mattel v Zynga, a trade mark decision he helped Mattel to appeal in November, during his primer on passing off law to the Supreme Court in Starbucks v BskyB last week
  • INTA Annual Meeting co-chairs Peter Dernbach and Rick McMurtry tell the INTA Daily News what registrants can expect at this year’s Annual Meeting.
  • The International Trade Commission issued a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order for Arista infringing three patents in an investigation brought by Cisco Systems relating to ethernet switch products
  • Google’s amendment of its trade mark policy in Europe will create disagreement over when competitors’ adverts are misleading, argues Simon Chapman of Lewis Silkin
  • Six US film studios have brought a copyright suit against Zediva, a start-up that blurs the line between DVD rental stores and online streaming services. In their complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, Warner Bros, Columbia, Disney, Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox and Universal Studios are asking for the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each DVD. Zediva, which was launched in March, offers much lower prices than other streaming services. It rents DVD players and films that users can remotely access online. A rented DVD copy cannot be checked out by another consumer while in use. The company insists it is a model unlike online streaming sites, such as Netflix, and likens itself to bricks-and-mortar DVD rental stores. It has stopped allowing new registrations so it can increase capacity.