Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 21,891 results that match your search.21,891 results
  • This is great news for brand owners, because nothing has happened for a long time on this issue
  • The new system of resolving domain name disputes in Hong Kong is a great improvement on the old method. Domain name owners can now make use of a quicker and cheaper way to assert their rights, explain Christopher Tung and Minny Siu
  • In highly competitive branches of industries, it is not unusual that an imitator makes use of the unprotected part of an invention as described in an original application of a previously granted patent by marketing a product lying out of the scope of protection. Since the imitator is not obliged to pay compensation for doing this, the patentee tries to seek protection for such subject matter that is not covered by the claims of the patent.
  • Stéphanie Bodoni, London
  • Slogans used as trade marks have been at the centre of a number of disputes on both sides of the Atlantic recently. Kate Hammond and Jason K Schmitz examine whether slogans qualify for protection, and how brand owners can obtain registrations
  • ? US: The Department of Commerce has agreed to extend its memorandum of understanding with ICANN for three years, and to include several specific targets to help with its privatization. The agreement was due to expire at the end of this September, but will now run until September 30 2006.
  • Stéphanie Bodoni, London
  • A hallmark of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) is that they are negative in nature. Although often described as "exclusive", IPRs entitle the owner only to prevent others using or misusing the subject of the right. A recent example is provided in the field of trade marks by Inter Lotto (UK) Ltd v Camelot Group plc [2003] EWCA Civ 1132.
  • The Mexican Law of Industrial Property (LIP) is designed to protect IP rights. On the other hand, the restitution of damages caused by an unlawful action is provided by the Federal Civil Code and should be enforced before a civil court.
  • Further to the Law of Ukraine On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Intellectual Property Protection adopted on May 22 2003, significant amendments have been introduced to the Law of Ukraine On Protection of Rights in Inventions and Utility Models (the Patent Law).