Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 21,835 results that match your search.21,835 results
  • Recent proceedings between T-Mobile (UK) Limited and O2 Holdings Limited have highlighted the relationship between revocation and invalidity of trade mark registrations, specifically: does one preclude the other?
  • With elections for a new WIPO director-general slated for May, Eklavya Gupte talked to the candidates for the top job
  • The current patent law in the Sultanate of Oman was introduced by Royal Decree number 82/2000, but due to logistical and administrative constraints, the Omani patent office only started accepting patent applications in December 2005, after the Ministry of Commerce published the official fees of patent applications in Oman.
  • In the recent case FILA Luxembourg SARL v The Turkish Patent Institute and Yardim Tekstil Ltd, the Turkish IP Court was required to consider whether the application for the trade mark FİLO was confusingly similar to the registered trade mark FILA.
  • The judicial branch of Taiwan has published two sets of rules drafted to clarify Article 38 of the Act of Trial Procedures in IP Dispute Cases promulgated on March 28 2007. One is the Enforcement Rules of the Act and the other provides guidelines for trial.
  • On November 23 2007, Commercial Court Number 1 of Bilbao gave its judgment in the proceedings between the famous architect Santiago Calatrava and the Town Council of Bilbao and other companies (Vizcaína de Edificaciones, SA and Lariam 95, SL).
  • The General Council of the WTO agreed in 2003 to waive the requirements of Article 31(f) of the TRIPs Agreement, in order to facilitate the import of pharmaceutical drugs to countries with no or insufficient manufacturing capacity. Singapore has accepted the amendments to the TRIPs Agreement and amendments have been proposed to the Singapore Patents Act to conform the TRIPs Agreement.
  • A judicial storm swept through the streets of Moscow and almost buried Venezia under the waves of attacks by a Russian owner of a similar trade mark. The story began when a Russian entrepreneur registered the trade mark Venezi in many classes including classes 41 and 43 covering restaurants. The trade mark was registered in block letters in Cyrillics in black and white. That was back in 2002. Years later another entrepreneur opened a restaurant under the name of Viaggio Italiano Venezia in the centre of Moscow. The owner of the trade mark filed a suit in court demanding the restaurateur to remove the confusingly similar designation from the signboard, menu, bills, etc. The court of first instance rejected the claims of the trade mark owner, in part because the plaintiff did not introduce on the market goods labelled with the Venezi trade mark that would fall under classes 41 and 43.
  • Traditionally in New Zealand claims directed to methods of diagnosis (MOD) have been allowable. This is based on well-established case law (for example, Bio-Digital Sciences Incorporated's Application [1973] 21 RPC 668) and on guidelines issued by the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) in October 1998.
  • On December 3 2007, the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA), the adjudication bureau of the Intellectual Property Office (IPPhil) presented to a public hearing proposed amendments to the rules and regulations on administrative complaints for violation of intellectual property laws. The objective of the amendments is to speed up the prosecution by the BLA of IP violation cases, for example, infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, false or fraudulent declaration.