Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,307 results that match your search.22,307 results
  • Lord Justice Jacob believes the current proposals for a European patent court will fail, but that reform will soon come through a “coalition of the willing”. In-house counsel can’t wait
  • A centralised trade mark clearinghouse will debut during the relaunch of the .so domain with the intention to be used in other launches
  • Like many others recently, the .mobi registry has asked Icann for permission to release one- and two-character domains
  • The registry operator of the .biz has informed Icann that it intends to increase the price of the domain
  • Antonio Campinos is not the only new appointment at OHIM. There will also be a new vice-president and members of the Boards of Appeal
  • Antonio Campinos succeeds Wubbo de Boer as head of OHIM today and according to users he has a lot to live up to
  • Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson successfully represented a client in the inaugural revocation proceedings of two patents in Singapore. Kristian Robinson and Soo Ee Lin explain how their firm did it
  • Jack Redfern and Matthew Ward of Shelston IP discuss the value of innovation patents
  • The Russian companies Russky Standart Vodka, LVZ Topaz and Sibirsky LVZ produce vodka and are competitors in the market. Topaz and Sibirsky produce and sell vodkas like Green Mark Traditional Recipe, Green Mark Rye and others. The neck of every bottle of those brands carries a collar reading "Vodka No 1 in Russia". It is obviously implied that Topaz and Sibirsky produce the best quality vodkas on the Russian market. The Russian Antimonopoly Service is a watchdog for incorrect marketing practices and directed its attention to that statement.
  • According to the current wording of the Mexican IP Law, injunctions can be imposed during the course of an infringement action related to trademarks, patents or slogans, and the plaintiff has to post a bond of an amount fixed by the Patent of Trade Mark Office (IMPI) in order to secure possible damages arising from those injunctions, if the infringement is eventually denied. Likewise, the injunctions can be immediately lifted if the alleged infringer obtains and files a counterbond in favor of the plaintiff.