EPO’s Battistelli emphasises quality

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EPO’s Battistelli emphasises quality

The European Patent Office will not raise official fees above inflation for the next four years, President Benoît Battistelli said yesterday. Interviewed after addressing yesterday’s AIPPI IP Panel Lunch, he also promised “we will find a solution” to the controversial question of the level of renewal fees for the proposed Unitary Patent

A committee representing participating member states is discussing those fees, but has yet to publish any details. However, Battistelli said the most important criteria is that the Unitary Patent should be “business-attractive”. It must also be budget-neutral for the EPO, and reasonable for member states.

Battistelli, whose term was recently extended by the Administrative Council until 2018, said the fees would be known at least six months before the first Unitary Patents are granted, which is expected to be in 2016. “I think we could fix as a target June 2015,” he said.

He identified the successful implementation of the Unitary Patent as one of the achievements he would like to complete by 2018, along with an improved IT system, positive social relations with the Office staff, the maintenance of the EPO’s reputation for quality and the development of international cooperation. “We have increased transparency despite what some negative minds say. All the goals are known so everyone can measure them,” he said.

In his speech, Battistelli emphasised that the Office is investing in training and tools (such as the CPC, Patent Translate and Early Certainty from Search) to meet the challenges arising from a growing workload and greater complexity. It has also added 500 examiners in recent years.

He told the AIPPI Congress News that the EPO will maintain and improve quality by simplifying procedures and enabling examiners to focus on “the core issues of search, examination and opposition”. He said: “This improvement in quality is substantive and significant and is for the sake of the IP world system.”

Asked about criticisms of his initiatives, Battistelli said most people accepted the need for change and added: “The EPO is a great European success story and staff can be proud of what they have achieved.” He said the vote in the Administrative Council showed he has the support of member states and stakeholders.

Read the full interview with Battistelli here 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article