What do in-house counsel think about the Unitary Patent & UPC?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

What do in-house counsel think about the Unitary Patent & UPC?

There are many questions that remain to be answered about Europe’s pending Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court. But perhaps some of the most important, and also most difficult, are: who will use it? What will make them want to use it? And what will scare them off?

munich-skyline2.jpg

Munich - home of the EPO and the Oktoberfest

Hopefully two forums we are hosting next month will address these questions. The panels and audience will include in-house counsel from various countries and industries, and they will be able to share their hopes and expectations on the new system.

The forums take place in two of the three locations for the central division of the UPC: the first is in Munich on September 9 and the second in Paris on September 11.

Among the speakers confirmed for both events are:

  • Jochen Meyer, head of IPR Germany at Vodafone

  • Simon Roberts, director of patents, BT

  • Jürgen Schneider, vice president, global IP & IP litigation, QIAGEN

  • Mathilde Rauline, head of European patent litigation, Sanofi

  • Richard Vary and Clemens Heusch, global head of litigation and head of European litigation, Nokia

  • Colette Vogele, director of IP policy, Microsoft

  • Michael Fröhlich, senior director, EU IP & strategy, BlackBerry

We also have judicial perspectives from Eskil Waage of the EPO (in Munich) and Tilmann Büttner of the Düsseldorf Court (in Paris).


Lively debates expected

paris-skyline2.jpg

Will the Eiffel Tower benefit from Paris's status as the home of the UPC central division?

In addition to the Unitary Patent and UPC, the forums will also feature sessions on related issues such as the role of the CJEU and the Swiss IP court.

With many companies having offices or headquarters near these two cities, we expect some interesting debates between speakers and audience on the merits of the proposed systems, and how much they will be used.

Although important questions remain to be addressed (notably about costs, who the judges are and the final rules of procedure) my impression is that many patent owners are more favourably disposed towards the new system than its critics would suggest.

That hunch was confirmed by a recent poll conducted by law firm Allen & Overy, which found that 49% of European patent managers would definitely opt in at least some of their patents to the UPC, and only 15% said they would definitely opt out some.

Meanwhile, it’s increasingly clear when you speak to patent specialists in Europe (particularly litigators) that firms are thinking hard about how to prepare for the changes. That includes by making appropriate hires, opening/expanding offices in the key locations and discussing mergers or alliances with other firms.

Time to prepare

The Unitary Patent and UPC proposals certainly do not please everyone, and they may not work perfectly to begin with, but most practitioners believe they are now going to happen – probably within the next two years – and that applicants (and third parties) need to start preparing now.

Our September events provide an opportunity to see if that is the case, and find out the latest thinking. Do come along if you can.

Attendance is free for in-house counsel, IP managers, R&D professionals and academics. All other Managing IP subscribers can take advantage of a 25% discount. Just quote: MIP25.

For more information or to register, please click here or contact Alicia Sprott: registrations@managingip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article