Our September issue is now online

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Our September issue is now online

MIP Sept 2018 168

Managing IP’s most recent issue includes articles on Section 101, blockchain, AI, personalised medicine, China FinTech, European trade mark cases and US patent damages

MIp Sept 2018Managing IP’s September issue is now online.

The issue’s cover story focuses on Section 101 in the US, which governs patentable subject matter. We reveal new data that suggests findings of invalidity have dropped since Berkheimer v HP, the most important US subject matter eligibility case of 2018, and analyse the reasons for this.

Also featured in the issue is:

·         European in-house IP counsel discussing the prospects and problems of personalised medicine.

·         AWA Asia’s IP strategy and patent team in Beijing looking at the China FinTech market, discussing available IP protection mechanisms and considering how revised guidelines could provide opportunities.

·         Dmitry Andreev analysing issues in patenting blockchain-related technologies.

·         A European trade mark double header, with David Stone discussing the difficulties of registering and enforcing shape trade marks in the European Union, and Managing IP analysing the most-important recent trade mark-related rulings from the CJEU, including cases involving Nestle, Puma, Louboutin and Red Bull.

·         Vincent Violago and Nikko Quevada tak a look at AI and the issue of bias, including discussing patents directed to bias mitigation.

·         We reveal the highest US patent damages awards so far this year, and reveal why higher damages may now be more achievable.

The issue also features our international briefings, bringing updates from around the globe (also listed below), as well as our regular Utynam column of IP curiosities and controversies.

Subscribers can read all this online now; non-subscribers can take a free trial for limited access. 

The September issue’s international briefings:

Africa: African governments show increased interest in IP protection

Australia: Change to Patent Examiners Manual creates uncertainty

Austria: When is joint use of trade marks allowed?

Brazil: Brazil offers attractive battleground for enforcing patents

Canada: Examining different forms of protection for personality rights

EPO: Applicant is responsible for checking patent text

Europe: Messi scores trade mark goal at EU General Court

France: Law on national domain images changes

Germany: Determining litigation value in patent appeals

India: Court rules in favour of Phillips in SEP dispute

Japan: Examining proposed amendments to evidence collection procedures

Malaysia: One Belt One Road brings opportunity and risk

Mexico: Public order, morals and good customs prevent trade mark

Netherlands: Supreme Court rules on role of description in claim interpretation

Philippines: Breeding a superior duck

Russia: Starbucks wins trade mark battle with One Bucks Coffee

Singapore: Singapore ranked most innovative non-European country in world

South Korea: Patenting a food-related invention in Korea

Taiwan: IP office allows deferred examination of design applications

Thailand: Supreme Court provides guidance on honest concurrent use

Turkey: TPTO refuses trade mark solely due to bad faith

UK: Patenting computer-implemented inventions

US: Court allows laches defence in cancellation case

Vietnam: New Law on Competition impacts IP

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article