France: Law on national domain images changes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Law on national domain images changes

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

A French court issued a ruling on April 13 2018 concerning the photographs of Chambord Castle used by Kronenbourg breweries in the context of an advertising campaign for one of their beers.

The case asked whether the castle, which is part of the public domain of the French state, can be reproduced without financial compensation or authorisation from the public institution.

Previously, commercial exploitation of a photograph of a private building has been allowed, without prior authorisation or any financial compensation, unless the photo caused abnormal disturbance to the owner of the building or if the owner had copyright on that building.

The court confirmed this ruling and rejected the argument that such commercial operation could be considered as private use of the public domain. Deciding differently would restrain the freedom of entrepreneurship.

This decision was, however, made prior to Law No. 2016-925 of July 7 2016 on the freedom of creation, architecture and heritage.

Now a specific system is set up for image rights of goods falling under the category of "national domain". A first list of six monuments and estates was submitted by the Ministry of Culture and Communication and validated by the Historical Monuments National Commission. On this list were the Chambord Estate, the Castle of Angers, the Palais du Rhin in Strasburg, the Estate of Pau, the Louvre and Tuileries Estates in Paris (1st) and the Palais de l'Elysée in Paris (8th).

Article L. 621-42 of the Heritage Code means that prior authorisation and potential financial compensation are now the rule for using an image of such buildings.

However, such authorisation is not required when the image also pursues a cultural, educational, research or information purpose or is linked to a public service task.

A decree should provide details about the concept of "commercial purpose".

marie.jpg

Aurélia Marie


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IPH’s strategy of integrating acquired businesses into its larger premium brands, may offer an early signal of how externally funded IP firms will pursue scale, efficiency and market strength
After bringing on board three new partners, the recently merged firm has its eyes on breaking into the top-flight of firms for patent disputes and ITC litigation
While the US and the UK remain the biggest markets for representation of women, their lead has narrowed
Former professional cricketer Ben Scott talks through the challenges of building a legal tech platform, transitioning from sportsman to entrepreneur and why he believes he has found a gap in the market
The benefits of offering a range of services, innovative enforcement approaches, and gradual AI adoption are all helping SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan develop its IP offering
Nick Redfearn, head of enforcement at Rouse and a classic car enthusiast, explains the sudden viral appearance of classic car restomod parts from China and the impact of IP in this new trade
Our 2026 rankings for Western Europe, taken with historical data, reveal that some European IP markets hardly change – while others are more fluid
Selina Hinchliffe, head of commercial services at Shakespeare Martineau, reflects on rejecting Cambridge, leading through empathy, and why authenticity matters more than fitting in
US corporates are using the UPC, but much of that work still flows to European boutiques. Last week’s merger, as well as others, could alter that dynamic
Publicly listed Australian group IPH delivered on its promise to profoundly shake up the Canadian market. Four years on, rivals have had time to adapt
Gift this article