Weekly take: Why AIPPI and INTA’s Dubai problem can’t be easily fixed

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Weekly take: Why AIPPI and INTA’s Dubai problem can’t be easily fixed

Blick auf die Business Bay in Dubai mit den modernen Wolkenkratzern bei Sonnenaufgang

AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate

In the end, the decision was taken out of their hands.

In an announcement on May 2, industry association AIPPI said it had agreed to postpone the World Congress scheduled to take place in Dubai in 2027.

No specific reasons were given, but you would assume the US-Iran war, which has also resulted in some explosions in Dubai, was the deciding factor.

Of course, this is the right decision. The safety of attendees must be paramount.

But let’s not forget that plenty of concerns were raised about the choice of venue long before the conflict erupted.

Those concerns were based on the fact that Dubai can be an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community.

Homosexuality is illegal in Dubai and the wider UAE, and is punishable by imprisonment.

In the past months, AIPPI members, including national groups in Australia, the Netherlands, and the UK, had all written to AIPPI leadership to express their concerns at the choice of venue.

Putting it bluntly, they were ignored.

As recently as the end of January, AIPPI said it fully intended to proceed with the conference.

The association, in a statement shared with Managing IP, said it had weighed a commitment to geographic rotation and engagement across regions with differing cultural, legal and religious contexts alongside its “core values” of inclusion, respect and equal participation.

In effect, the IP professions' LGBTQIA+ community, which is not insignificant in size, was not considered important enough.

It will come as scant consolation to those members that Dubai as a venue has now been shelved.

It seems that when it comes to delegate safety, there is a hierarchy. A nearby war is worth a postponement, but the ostracisation and very real potential threat to a portion of delegates is not.

You could argue that everyone has a choice whether to attend a conference or not. But why should attendees be forced to make that choice, particularly when they are having to consider their own right to be themselves?

INTA is facing a similar problem, too, of course.

It had originally planned to host its 2026 Annual Meeting in Dubai.

After Dubai was revealed as a host city, the October 7 2023 attacks in Israel took place, followed by Israel’s response in nearby Gaza.

INTA eventually postponed the meeting from 2026 to 2029.

No official reason was provided.

As with AIPPI, there was, according to multiple sources, concern over the choice of venue among INTA members. It was said at one point that a potential boycott was on the cards, such was the level of discontent.

As it stands, INTA still plans to head to Dubai in 2029, though this is by no means certain. AIPPI, it said, will explore the possibility of heading there in 2030 or 2031.

Both organisations will need to carefully consider where they truly stand on diversity and inclusion and fostering a safe environment for all.

The conflict in the region will hopefully pass, and Dubai will once again be considered ‘safe’ for travel. The laws and regulations preventing the LGBTQIA+ community from feeling safe will not.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With genuine equity at IP firms becoming rarer, securing partnership is harder than ever, but increased transparency is also making climbing the ladder more predictable
Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
Gift this article