Weekly take: Why AIPPI and INTA’s Dubai problem can’t be easily fixed

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Weekly take: Why AIPPI and INTA’s Dubai problem can’t be easily fixed

Blick auf die Business Bay in Dubai mit den modernen Wolkenkratzern bei Sonnenaufgang

AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate

In the end, the decision was taken out of their hands.

In an announcement on May 2, industry association AIPPI said it had agreed to postpone the World Congress scheduled to take place in Dubai in 2027.

No specific reasons were given, but you would assume the US-Iran war, which has also resulted in some explosions in Dubai, was the deciding factor.

Of course, this is the right decision. The safety of attendees must be paramount.

But let’s not forget that plenty of concerns were raised about the choice of venue long before the conflict erupted.

Those concerns were based on the fact that Dubai can be an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community.

Homosexuality is illegal in Dubai and the wider UAE, and is punishable by imprisonment.

In the past months, AIPPI members, including national groups in Australia, the Netherlands, and the UK, had all written to AIPPI leadership to express their concerns at the choice of venue.

Putting it bluntly, they were ignored.

As recently as the end of January, AIPPI said it fully intended to proceed with the conference.

The association, in a statement shared with Managing IP, said it had weighed a commitment to geographic rotation and engagement across regions with differing cultural, legal and religious contexts alongside its “core values” of inclusion, respect and equal participation.

In effect, the IP professions' LGBTQIA+ community, which is not insignificant in size, was not considered important enough.

It will come as scant consolation to those members that Dubai as a venue has now been shelved.

It seems that when it comes to delegate safety, there is a hierarchy. A nearby war is worth a postponement, but the ostracisation and very real potential threat to a portion of delegates is not.

You could argue that everyone has a choice whether to attend a conference or not. But why should attendees be forced to make that choice, particularly when they are having to consider their own right to be themselves?

INTA is facing a similar problem, too, of course.

It had originally planned to host its 2026 Annual Meeting in Dubai.

After Dubai was revealed as a host city, the October 7 2023 attacks in Israel took place, followed by Israel’s response in nearby Gaza.

INTA eventually postponed the meeting from 2026 to 2029.

No official reason was provided.

As with AIPPI, there was, according to multiple sources, concern over the choice of venue among INTA members. It was said at one point that a potential boycott was on the cards, such was the level of discontent.

As it stands, INTA still plans to head to Dubai in 2029, though this is by no means certain. AIPPI, it said, will explore the possibility of heading there in 2030 or 2031.

Both organisations will need to carefully consider where they truly stand on diversity and inclusion and fostering a safe environment for all.

The conflict in the region will hopefully pass, and Dubai will once again be considered ‘safe’ for travel. The laws and regulations preventing the LGBTQIA+ community from feeling safe will not.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
Gift this article