Our IP STARS rankings are changing: here’s how

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Our IP STARS rankings are changing: here’s how

IP STARS TIMELINE article image.png

New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view

Managing IP’s accreditation title, IP STARS, has unveiled changes to how it publishes its firm and practitioner rankings, with releases now scheduled by jurisdiction rather than practice area.

Starting this year, we will release four batches of jurisdiction-specific rankings, each covering specific practice areas, as well as firm reviews and client testimonials.

We will still rank practitioners and firms in the same sector-specific areas: patents, trademarks, copyright, and transactions.

However, rather than being released as separate rankings with multijurisdictional inclusion, those practice area rankings will instead be included in each jurisdictional release.

The timeline for releases is as follows:

  • Asia-Pacific: June 4

  • Western Europe: June 25

  • CEE Middle East and Africa: July 16

  • Americas: July 30

Chris Adams, research lead at Managing IP, said: “We understand the importance of firms’ ability to promote their successes, so this change to the IP STARS release schedule is being made with an aim towards having a clearer timeline, plus the added benefit of viewing all results for any given geographic region at once.”

IP STARS rankings for corporate stars and the Top 250 Women in IP will be published separately.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Richard de Bodo, who had a lengthy career at international firms, shares how he will address client needs and praises the unique offerings of smaller firms
An Australian top court decision clarifying honest concurrent use and wins by publishers against AI platforms were also among the top talking points
AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Azhar Sadique and Kane Ridley, who founded the London office in 2023, are now both working in legal tech and AI-related roles, while another UK-based lawyer has also left
Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
Gift this article