Our IP STARS rankings are changing: here’s how

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Our IP STARS rankings are changing: here’s how

IP STARS TIMELINE article image.png

New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view

Managing IP’s accreditation title, IP STARS, has unveiled changes to how it publishes its firm and practitioner rankings, with releases now scheduled by jurisdiction rather than practice area.

Starting this year, we will release four batches of jurisdiction-specific rankings, each covering specific practice areas, as well as firm reviews and client testimonials.

We will still rank practitioners and firms in the same sector-specific areas: patents, trademarks, copyright, and transactions.

However, rather than being released as separate rankings with multijurisdictional inclusion, those practice area rankings will instead be included in each jurisdictional release.

The timeline for releases is as follows:

  • Asia-Pacific: June 4

  • Western Europe: June 25

  • CEE Middle East and Africa: July 16

  • Americas: July 30

Chris Adams, research lead at Managing IP, said: “We understand the importance of firms’ ability to promote their successes, so this change to the IP STARS release schedule is being made with an aim towards having a clearer timeline, plus the added benefit of viewing all results for any given geographic region at once.”

IP STARS rankings for corporate stars and the Top 250 Women in IP will be published separately.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The new partners add patent trial depth in high-value technology sectors including semiconductors, software, and cloud computing
From seller vetting and proprietary screening technology to brand collaboration and industry partnerships, Temu explains how its intellectual property enforcement programme combats infringement on its marketplace
A handful of US firms have quietly invested in European patent talent. Recent moves by Baker Botts and K&L Gates suggest that trend may be accelerating
Loke Khoon Tan and Stephanie Yip at Dentons explain what brand owners need to know ahead of January 1 2027, when updates to China’s Trade Mark Law come into force
New US bills signal that firms should work with clients to ensure they are complying with potential regulatory requirements
Octavio Espejo of Becerril, Coca & Becerril explains how sweeping patent reforms reshape filing strategies, prosecution, and divisional application practice
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in Tesla v Avanci enhances the UK's attractiveness for global FRAND battles, say lawyers at Simmons & Simmons
PE-backed practices now comprise the majority of ranked firms for patent prosecution in the Netherlands, but competitors are confident about their decision to remain independent
The firm says new additions position Brown Rudnick as a market leader in tech, life sciences, and global litigation
Richard Quatrano, counsel at Olshan Frome Wolosky, shares why technology M&A buyers and sellers must verify written IP assignments, as broken ownership chains can undermine valuation, deal terms, and closing certainty
Gift this article