Podcast – Design protection is underrated: why design rights should be an integral part of your portfolio

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Podcast – Design protection is underrated: why design rights should be an integral part of your portfolio

Sponsored by

Zacco_360 IP_RGB.jpg
900x505-article@2x.png

Design rights are set to play an increasingly important role in strengthening global intellectual property strategies, say Tomas Wässingbo of Zacco and Christina Wainikka of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

Design rights are a powerful – but often overlooked – component of a well-rounded intellectual property portfolio. In an exclusive Managing IP podcast, Tomas Wässingbo, group designs director at the international full-service intellectual property firm Zacco, and Christina Wainikka, intellectual property policy expert at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, explain why companies should be paying closer attention to this form of protection. The need is heightened in light of the new EU Design Regulation and Directive, with several provisions having entered into force on May 1 2025.

The key themes discussed

The podcast explores the following areas, among others:

  • The main differences between design, patent, and trademark rights;

  • Debunking the myth that design rights are only applicable to certain industries;

  • The primary attributes of design rights, including strong protection, swift registration, and clear ownership;

  • Wide-ranging case law, from Vespa mopeds to rye bread; and

  • How to use design rights to help to future-proof your intellectual property portfolio.

Design rights: emerging from the shadows?

Despite their strength and versatility, design rights remain underused. As Wässingbo notes, “Maybe one can say that design is often in the shadow of patents, utility patents, and trademarks.”

Indeed, according to a January 2025 EUIPO report cited in the podcast, only 1% of SMEs and 10% of large companies in the EU own design rights, even though design right owners have 29.3% higher revenue per employee. A lack of awareness, fragmented responsibility across departments, and misconceptions about design protection have contributed to their underutilisation. “There is a lack of understanding of the benefits of design protection and also sometimes there is an obstacle in how [to] organise IP issues in different companies,” Wainikka says.

But change is afoot. The new EU legislative initiatives introduce several features that could heighten awareness. “[One] thing that is happening in Europe with the new design regime is that we will get this registered design symbol D with the ring around it, like the order for registered trademarks,” Wässingbo says. “That is something that everyone will see and hopefully that will lead to more understanding [that] there is a possibility to protect something with design rights like there is the possibility to protect the trademark.”

The outlook for design rights

Design rights appear poised to assume a bigger role, especially when considering factors such as gaming and mobile apps falling within their scope. Businesses with intellectual property portfolios should stay alert to the opportunities presented. As Wässingbo puts it: “We should all design the future.”

The speakers

Tomas Wässingbo.jpg

Tomas Wässingbo

Group designs director, Zacco

Tomas started his career in intellectual property at the Swedish Patent Office over 20 years ago. Moving in-house to one of the world’s largest consumer electronics and multimedia organisations, he spent a decade responsible for leveraging its international patent value and cross-purpose commercial viability of intellectual property rights.

Joining Zacco in 2015, Tomas is now responsible for the group strategy and the direction of Zacco’s extensive design practice.

Christina+Wainikka.jpg

Christina Wainikka

Intellectual property policy expert, Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

Christina is a leading authority on intellectual property law and policy in Sweden, and a respected author of multiple books on the topics of designs, copyrights, trade secrets, and other forms of protecting innovation. She has previously served as a board member for associations in areas as diverse as law, information security, and anti-counterfeiting.

Christina now advocates on behalf of Swedish businesses on the global stage in her role as policy expert at Svenskt Näringsliv (the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise).

Other Zacco content

Further intellectual property resources are available on Zacco’s homepage on Managing IP, including the following:

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article