Podcast – Design protection is underrated: why design rights should be an integral part of your portfolio

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Podcast – Design protection is underrated: why design rights should be an integral part of your portfolio

Sponsored by

Zacco_360 IP_RGB.jpg
900x505-article@2x.png

Design rights are set to play an increasingly important role in strengthening global intellectual property strategies, say Tomas Wässingbo of Zacco and Christina Wainikka of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

Design rights are a powerful – but often overlooked – component of a well-rounded intellectual property portfolio. In an exclusive Managing IP podcast, Tomas Wässingbo, group designs director at the international full-service intellectual property firm Zacco, and Christina Wainikka, intellectual property policy expert at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, explain why companies should be paying closer attention to this form of protection. The need is heightened in light of the new EU Design Regulation and Directive, with several provisions having entered into force on May 1 2025.

The key themes discussed

The podcast explores the following areas, among others:

  • The main differences between design, patent, and trademark rights;

  • Debunking the myth that design rights are only applicable to certain industries;

  • The primary attributes of design rights, including strong protection, swift registration, and clear ownership;

  • Wide-ranging case law, from Vespa mopeds to rye bread; and

  • How to use design rights to help to future-proof your intellectual property portfolio.

Design rights: emerging from the shadows?

Despite their strength and versatility, design rights remain underused. As Wässingbo notes, “Maybe one can say that design is often in the shadow of patents, utility patents, and trademarks.”

Indeed, according to a January 2025 EUIPO report cited in the podcast, only 1% of SMEs and 10% of large companies in the EU own design rights, even though design right owners have 29.3% higher revenue per employee. A lack of awareness, fragmented responsibility across departments, and misconceptions about design protection have contributed to their underutilisation. “There is a lack of understanding of the benefits of design protection and also sometimes there is an obstacle in how [to] organise IP issues in different companies,” Wainikka says.

But change is afoot. The new EU legislative initiatives introduce several features that could heighten awareness. “[One] thing that is happening in Europe with the new design regime is that we will get this registered design symbol D with the ring around it, like the order for registered trademarks,” Wässingbo says. “That is something that everyone will see and hopefully that will lead to more understanding [that] there is a possibility to protect something with design rights like there is the possibility to protect the trademark.”

The outlook for design rights

Design rights appear poised to assume a bigger role, especially when considering factors such as gaming and mobile apps falling within their scope. Businesses with intellectual property portfolios should stay alert to the opportunities presented. As Wässingbo puts it: “We should all design the future.”

The speakers

Tomas Wässingbo.jpg

Tomas Wässingbo

Group designs director, Zacco

Tomas started his career in intellectual property at the Swedish Patent Office over 20 years ago. Moving in-house to one of the world’s largest consumer electronics and multimedia organisations, he spent a decade responsible for leveraging its international patent value and cross-purpose commercial viability of intellectual property rights.

Joining Zacco in 2015, Tomas is now responsible for the group strategy and the direction of Zacco’s extensive design practice.

Christina+Wainikka.jpg

Christina Wainikka

Intellectual property policy expert, Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

Christina is a leading authority on intellectual property law and policy in Sweden, and a respected author of multiple books on the topics of designs, copyrights, trade secrets, and other forms of protecting innovation. She has previously served as a board member for associations in areas as diverse as law, information security, and anti-counterfeiting.

Christina now advocates on behalf of Swedish businesses on the global stage in her role as policy expert at Svenskt Näringsliv (the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise).

Other Zacco content

Further intellectual property resources are available on Zacco’s homepage on Managing IP, including the following:

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
The court ruled against the owner of the ‘Umbro’ mark, despite noting that post-sale confusion can be a legitimate ground for infringement
Shem Otanga discusses the importance of curiosity and passion, and why he would have loved to have been a professional recording artist
Practitioners say the Bombay High Court shouldn’t have refused well-known trademark recognition for TikTok simply because the app is banned in India
In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Novo Nordisk losing patent rights covering Ozempic in Canada and a US Supreme Court decision favouring Ed Sheeran were also among the top talking points
The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Developments included a stay in a row concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction and a timeline for the rollout of the long-awaited new CMS
Gift this article