Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

EUIPO office, Alicante
EUIPO office, Alicante

The EUIPO won’t be able to offset member states’ costs due to poor financial performance this year

The EUIPO will not issue lucrative payouts to national intellectual property offices in 2024 because of a drop in trademark filings this year, the office confirmed to Managing IP today, December 7.

The latest EUIPO budget, adopted on November 24, predicted that the office would not generate a surplus in the 2022 financial year, meaning a mechanism for compensating national IP offices would not be triggered.

A statement from the EUIPO to Managing IP said the office had been hit by global economic uncertainties and rising inflation.

The office took measures to control expenditure as soon as it became clear trademark filings would fall this year, the statement said.

“However, the general increase in prices and inflation, combined with the loss in revenue cannot be compensated by saving measures without significantly affecting the office capacity to operate and the level of services provided to customers,” it added.

Under the 2017 Trademark Regulation, the EUIPO can use 5% of its total revenue in a financial year to offset costs incurred by national IP offices related to the EU trademark system.

But, under the rules, the offsetting mechanism is only triggered if the EUIPO generates a surplus.

The office projected revenues of just under €287 million ($302 million) for this year, representing a fall of €17 million ($17.9 million) from 2021.

The EUIPO would need to generate an additional €27 million ($28.4 million) in 2022 to trigger to be able to offset national offices' costs.

Offsetting payments would have been made in the first quarter of 2024 after the accounts for the 2022 financial year had been closed and signed off.

The mechanism was first triggered in 2018 and subsequently took effect in each of the following three years.

The EUIPO budgeted €15.1 million ($15.9 million) for offset costs in 2023, a figure that corresponded to 5% of the office’s revenue in 2021.

Departing EUIPO executive director Christian Archambeau predicted two weeks ago that EU trademark filings could fall by 12% this year compared to 2021.

Archambeau, who recently lost a vote to extend his term as executive director, attributed the fall to events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It is understood that the EUIPO’s disappointing financial performance was discussed at a joint meeting of the management board and budget committee (MBBC) on November 24.

This was the same meeting in which the MBBC voted to replace Archambeau as executive director.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article