Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

EUIPO office, Alicante
EUIPO office, Alicante

The EUIPO won’t be able to offset member states’ costs due to poor financial performance this year

The EUIPO will not issue lucrative payouts to national intellectual property offices in 2024 because of a drop in trademark filings this year, the office confirmed to Managing IP today, December 7.

The latest EUIPO budget, adopted on November 24, predicted that the office would not generate a surplus in the 2022 financial year, meaning a mechanism for compensating national IP offices would not be triggered.

A statement from the EUIPO to Managing IP said the office had been hit by global economic uncertainties and rising inflation.

The office took measures to control expenditure as soon as it became clear trademark filings would fall this year, the statement said.

“However, the general increase in prices and inflation, combined with the loss in revenue cannot be compensated by saving measures without significantly affecting the office capacity to operate and the level of services provided to customers,” it added.

Under the 2017 Trademark Regulation, the EUIPO can use 5% of its total revenue in a financial year to offset costs incurred by national IP offices related to the EU trademark system.

But, under the rules, the offsetting mechanism is only triggered if the EUIPO generates a surplus.

The office projected revenues of just under €287 million ($302 million) for this year, representing a fall of €17 million ($17.9 million) from 2021.

The EUIPO would need to generate an additional €27 million ($28.4 million) in 2022 to trigger to be able to offset national offices' costs.

Offsetting payments would have been made in the first quarter of 2024 after the accounts for the 2022 financial year had been closed and signed off.

The mechanism was first triggered in 2018 and subsequently took effect in each of the following three years.

The EUIPO budgeted €15.1 million ($15.9 million) for offset costs in 2023, a figure that corresponded to 5% of the office’s revenue in 2021.

Departing EUIPO executive director Christian Archambeau predicted two weeks ago that EU trademark filings could fall by 12% this year compared to 2021.

Archambeau, who recently lost a vote to extend his term as executive director, attributed the fall to events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It is understood that the EUIPO’s disappointing financial performance was discussed at a joint meeting of the management board and budget committee (MBBC) on November 24.

This was the same meeting in which the MBBC voted to replace Archambeau as executive director.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article