Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Drop in EUTMs will cost national IP offices

EUIPO office, Alicante
EUIPO office, Alicante

The EUIPO won’t be able to offset member states’ costs due to poor financial performance this year

The EUIPO will not issue lucrative payouts to national intellectual property offices in 2024 because of a drop in trademark filings this year, the office confirmed to Managing IP today, December 7.

The latest EUIPO budget, adopted on November 24, predicted that the office would not generate a surplus in the 2022 financial year, meaning a mechanism for compensating national IP offices would not be triggered.

A statement from the EUIPO to Managing IP said the office had been hit by global economic uncertainties and rising inflation.

The office took measures to control expenditure as soon as it became clear trademark filings would fall this year, the statement said.

“However, the general increase in prices and inflation, combined with the loss in revenue cannot be compensated by saving measures without significantly affecting the office capacity to operate and the level of services provided to customers,” it added.

Under the 2017 Trademark Regulation, the EUIPO can use 5% of its total revenue in a financial year to offset costs incurred by national IP offices related to the EU trademark system.

But, under the rules, the offsetting mechanism is only triggered if the EUIPO generates a surplus.

The office projected revenues of just under €287 million ($302 million) for this year, representing a fall of €17 million ($17.9 million) from 2021.

The EUIPO would need to generate an additional €27 million ($28.4 million) in 2022 to trigger to be able to offset national offices' costs.

Offsetting payments would have been made in the first quarter of 2024 after the accounts for the 2022 financial year had been closed and signed off.

The mechanism was first triggered in 2018 and subsequently took effect in each of the following three years.

The EUIPO budgeted €15.1 million ($15.9 million) for offset costs in 2023, a figure that corresponded to 5% of the office’s revenue in 2021.

Departing EUIPO executive director Christian Archambeau predicted two weeks ago that EU trademark filings could fall by 12% this year compared to 2021.

Archambeau, who recently lost a vote to extend his term as executive director, attributed the fall to events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It is understood that the EUIPO’s disappointing financial performance was discussed at a joint meeting of the management board and budget committee (MBBC) on November 24.

This was the same meeting in which the MBBC voted to replace Archambeau as executive director.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article