Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The England and Wales High Court found ‘compelling evidence’ that ‘Shape of You’ did not infringe a songwriter’s earlier work

Ed Sheeran has won a copyright infringement trial centring on his 2017 hit ‘Shape of You’, the England and Wales High Court ruled this morning, April 6.

In the judgment, His Honour Justice Antony Zacaroli said there was “compelling evidence” that Sheeran’s ‘Shape of You’ originated from sources other than the song he was accused of copying.

Singer-songwriter Sheeran was facing accusations that ‘Shape of You’ copied aspects from ‘Oh Why’, a 2015 song written by Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donoghue, performed by Chokri under the alias Sami Switch. Sheeran denied copyright infringement.

The portion of ‘Shape of You’ questioned was the ‘oh I’ hook, which was alleged to be strikingly similar to an ‘oh why’ refrain in Switch’s work.

‘Shape of You’ is one of Sheeran’s most successful tracks and was number one in the singles charts of 34 countries.

In court last month, Andrew Sutcliffe QC, a barrister at 3VB in London acting for Chokri and O’Donoghue, described Sheeran as “an obsessive music squirrel” who “borrows ideas” from other artists.

But handing down judgment this morning, Zacaroli said that although there are similarities between the tracks, this threshold is “only a starting point” to a successful infringement claim.

To prove infringement under UK copyright law, it must be shown that a defendant likely had access to the allegedly infringed work and that a substantial portion must have been copied.

One of Switch’s arguments was that Sheeran must have encountered the song, as it appeared on well-known YouTube channel SBTV, of which Sheeran is a fan. Switch also noted that he had targeted Sheeran on Twitter in the hope of sparking interest in his work.

But Zacaroli said the evidence put forward to prove access was “no more than speculative” and found it was likely Sheeran had not heard ‘Oh I’.

In 2017, Sheeran faced a separate copyright allegation, which centred on another of his songs called ‘Photograph’. That case settled the same year.

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
A boom in transactional work and a heightened awareness of IP have helped boost revenue for the rebranded commercial services team
Clemens Heusch, head of global litigation and dispute resolution at Nokia, tells us why open conversations – and respectful challenges – lead to the best results
Siegmund Gutman, who joined Mintz one year ago, explains the firm’s approach to life sciences litigation and what it means for hiring plans
The merger of two IP boutiques could prompt others to follow suit and challenge Australia’s externally funded firms
Gift this article