Teresa Stanek Rea: USPTO “in the eye of a hurricane”
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Teresa Stanek Rea: USPTO “in the eye of a hurricane”

USPTO acting director Teresa Stanek Rea yesterday criticised the breakdown in budget negotiations between Democrats and Republicans as “a sad and stark contrast” to bipartisan cooperation on the America Invents Act

“We are living in interesting times,” said Rea, in a speech to attendees at the AIPLA Annual Meeting. “That is the polite way of putting it, anyway, when I think about the heightened partisan rhetoric in Washington this year, and over the past few weeks in ­particular.”


The USPTO has suffered directly from the political standoff in the form of budget sequestration, which requires the Office to give 5% of its income, or $150 million, to the US Treasury. It has also faced challenges including the departure of former Director David Kappos in January and Rea’s recent announcement of her own intention to resign.


Rea did not talk about her decision to leave the USPTO, which she revealed in an email to colleagues last month. But she said “ideological fault lines” and “differing business models” pose “the same risk of paralysis” in IP debates as has recently been seen in Congress.


“We are all caught in the swirling winds of a never-ending hurricane that is the IP policy debate,” said Rea, adding that the USPTO “sits in the eye of that hurricane.”


She added that despite the setbacks, the Office has continued to reduce the patent backlog since former director David Kappos left in January. The backlog now stands at 586,000, down 18% since 2009 despite a continued growth in filings, which were up 7% this year.


Rea said the Office is making progress on Obama’s five Executive Actions, which the White House announced in June. Four of the them will be implemented through the USPTO. She said revised guidance and training has been provided to examiners on how to identify a means-plus-function ­limitation.


The USPTO is also working on international harmonization with IP offices in Europe, China, Japan and Korea. In January 2014, the Offices will launch a pilot program called IP5 PPH (Patent Prosecution Highway), which will allow fast-track examination in one office after another has found one or more claims allowable.


She said attendees should “stay tuned” for new rules based on public comments the USPTO has previously received on patent trolls’ ability to mask their identity through shell companies.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Cross-border judicial collaboration and EU copyright were hot topics on the second day of the EUIPO’s 5th IP Case Law Conference
Gift this article