UK drops plans for superfast patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK drops plans for superfast patents

The UK government has ditched plans to allow IP owners to pay for a 90-day patent processing service following a consultation with IP Office users

The Office published its consultation paper in April, asking users whether they would be willing to pay for an expedited service. Although some were in favour, others raised concerns that it could lead to the granting of invalid patents; that it would place a heavier burden on third parties to monitor applications and respond more quickly; and that early publication could prove a commercial disadvantage to applicants. Nor were respondents convinced of the benefits of paying a fee estimated at between £3,500 and £4,000 ($5,500 - $6,250) for a superfast service when the IPO already operates accelerated search and examination services.

The IPO received 22 responses from patent attorney groups, IP professionals and businesses. Now the government says that there appears to be insufficient demand for a new superfast service.

The plan for superfast patent grants was announced by UK Business Secretary Vince Cable in December as part of a series of measures the government was proposing to boost creativity and innovation. One week later the government revealed controversial proposals to widen the exceptions in the country’s copyright laws.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article